WallStSmart

Circle Internet Group, Inc. (CRCL)vsGoldman Sachs Group Inc (GS)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Goldman Sachs Group Inc generates 2261% more annual revenue ($67.57B vs $2.86B). GS leads profitability with a 31.0% profit margin vs -2.8%. GS appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.54. GS earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 81/100 (A-).

CRCL

Avoid

35

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 6.7Profit: 3.0Value: 4.0Quality: 5.0
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 0.07

GS

Exceptional Buy

81

out of 100

Grade: A-

Growth: 10.0Profit: 8.0Value: 5.7Quality: 3.0
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 0.14

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CRCL2 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Debt/EquityHealth
0.0010/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Revenue GrowthGrowth
20.0%8/10

Revenue surging 20.0% year-over-year

GS6 strengths · Avg: 9.7/10
Market CapQuality
$311.24B10/10

Mega-cap, among the largest globally

Profit MarginProfitability
31.0%10/10

Keeps 31 of every $100 in revenue as profit

Operating MarginProfitability
42.3%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 42.3%

Revenue GrowthGrowth
42.5%10/10

Revenue surging 42.5% year-over-year

EPS GrowthGrowth
92.3%10/10

Earnings expanding 92.3% YoY

P/E RatioValuation
16.8x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Areas to Watch

CRCL4 concerns · Avg: 2.3/10
Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
6.862/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Return on EquityProfitability
-2.3%2/10

ROE of -2.3% — below average capital efficiency

EPS GrowthGrowth
-80.9%2/10

Earnings declined 80.9%

GS4 concerns · Avg: 2.3/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.544/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Free Cash FlowQuality
$-32.43B2/10

Negative free cash flow — burning cash

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
0.142/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Debt/EquityHealth
6.471/10

Elevated debt levels

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CRCL

The strongest argument for CRCL centers on Debt/Equity, Revenue Growth. Revenue growth of 20.0% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : GS

The strongest argument for GS centers on Market Cap, Profit Margin, Operating Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 31.0% and operating margin at 42.3%. Revenue growth of 42.5% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : CRCL

The primary concerns for CRCL are Piotroski F-Score, PEG Ratio, Return on Equity.

Bear Case : GS

The primary concerns for GS are PEG Ratio, Free Cash Flow, Altman Z-Score. Debt-to-equity of 6.47 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

GS is growing revenue faster at 42.5% — sustainability is the question.

CRCL generates stronger free cash flow (5M), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor CAPITAL MARKETS industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

GS scores higher overall (81/100 vs 35/100), backed by strong 31.0% margins and 42.5% revenue growth. Both earn "Exceptional Buy" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Circle Internet Group, Inc.

FINANCIAL SERVICES · CAPITAL MARKETS · USA

Circle Internet Group, Inc. is a platform, network, and market infrastructure for stablecoin and blockchain applications. The company is headquartered in New York, New York.

Visit Website →

Goldman Sachs Group Inc

FINANCIAL SERVICES · CAPITAL MARKETS · USA

The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., is an American multinational investment bank and financial services company headquartered in New York City. It offers services in investment management, securities, asset management, prime brokerage, and securities underwriting. It also provides investment banking to institutional investors.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?