WallStSmart

Federal Realty Investment Trust (FRT)vsSite Centers Corp (SITC)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Federal Realty Investment Trust generates 815% more annual revenue ($1.28B vs $139.96M). FRT leads profitability with a 32.1% profit margin vs 26.9%. FRT appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 3.65. FRT earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 66/100 (B-).

FRT

Strong Buy

66

out of 100

Grade: B-

Growth: 7.3Profit: 8.0Value: 7.3Quality: 4.3
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 0.59

SITC

Hold

44

out of 100

Grade: D

Growth: 2.0Profit: 5.0Value: 4.7Quality: 6.0
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: -3.67
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

FRTUndervalued (+51.2%)

Margin of Safety

+51.2%

Fair Value

$219.02

Current Price

$103.27

$115.75 discount

UndervaluedFair: $219.02Overvalued
SITCSignificantly Overvalued (-74.8%)

Margin of Safety

-74.8%

Fair Value

$3.67

Current Price

$5.37

$1.70 premium

UndervaluedFair: $3.67Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

FRT4 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
Profit MarginProfitability
32.1%10/10

Keeps 32 of every $100 in revenue as profit

Operating MarginProfitability
34.5%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 34.5%

EPS GrowthGrowth
98.7%10/10

Earnings expanding 98.7% YoY

Price/BookValuation
2.9x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

SITC3 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Price/BookValuation
0.9x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Profit MarginProfitability
26.9%9/10

Keeps 27 of every $100 in revenue as profit

P/E RatioValuation
12.5x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Areas to Watch

FRT2 concerns · Avg: 2.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
3.652/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
0.592/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

SITC4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Market CapQuality
$355.07M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Return on EquityProfitability
2.5%3/10

ROE of 2.5% — below average capital efficiency

PEG RatioValuation
7.592/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-56.6%2/10

Revenue declined 56.6%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : FRT

The strongest argument for FRT centers on Profit Margin, Operating Margin, EPS Growth. Profitability is solid with margins at 32.1% and operating margin at 34.5%.

Bull Case : SITC

The strongest argument for SITC centers on Price/Book, Profit Margin, P/E Ratio. Profitability is solid with margins at 26.9% and operating margin at -14.4%.

Bear Case : FRT

The primary concerns for FRT are PEG Ratio, Altman Z-Score.

Bear Case : SITC

The primary concerns for SITC are Market Cap, Return on Equity, PEG Ratio.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

FRT profiles as a mature stock while SITC is a declining play — different risk/reward profiles.

SITC carries more volatility with a beta of 1.16 — expect wider price swings.

FRT is growing revenue faster at 7.5% — sustainability is the question.

FRT generates stronger free cash flow (51M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

FRT scores higher overall (66/100 vs 44/100), backed by strong 32.1% margins. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Federal Realty Investment Trust

REAL ESTATE · REIT - RETAIL · USA

Federal Realty Investment Trust is a real estate investment trust that invests in shopping centers in the Northeastern United States, the Mid-Atlantic states, California, and South Florida.

Site Centers Corp

REAL ESTATE · REIT - RETAIL · USA

SITE Centers owns and manages outdoor shopping centers that provide a highly engaging shopping experience and product mix for retail partners and consumers.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?