WallStSmart

Forestar Group Inc (FOR)vsRenX Enterprises Corp. (RENX)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Forestar Group Inc generates 33798% more annual revenue ($1.69B vs $4.97M). FOR leads profitability with a 9.9% profit margin vs -2.8%. FOR earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 48/100 (D+).

FOR

Hold

48

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 4.0Profit: 6.0Value: 4.7Quality: 5.0

RENX

Avoid

31

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 6.3Profit: 2.0Value: 5.0Quality: 3.0
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: -3.92
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

FORSignificantly Overvalued (-32.7%)

Margin of Safety

-32.7%

Fair Value

$22.24

Current Price

$25.32

$3.08 premium

UndervaluedFair: $22.24Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for RENX.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

FOR2 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
7.4x10/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
0.7x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

RENX2 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Price/BookValuation
0.3x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Revenue GrowthGrowth
42.3%10/10

Revenue surging 42.3% year-over-year

Areas to Watch

FOR4 concerns · Avg: 2.3/10
Market CapQuality
$1.24B3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

PEG RatioValuation
4.902/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

EPS GrowthGrowth
-6.3%2/10

Earnings declined 6.3%

Free Cash FlowQuality
$-157.10M2/10

Negative free cash flow — burning cash

RENX4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
0.0%4/10

0.0% earnings growth

Market CapQuality
$6.44M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Return on EquityProfitability
-9.8%2/10

ROE of -9.8% — below average capital efficiency

Free Cash FlowQuality
$-671,9812/10

Negative free cash flow — burning cash

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : FOR

The strongest argument for FOR centers on P/E Ratio, Price/Book.

Bull Case : RENX

The strongest argument for RENX centers on Price/Book, Revenue Growth. Revenue growth of 42.3% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : FOR

The primary concerns for FOR are Market Cap, PEG Ratio, EPS Growth.

Bear Case : RENX

The primary concerns for RENX are EPS Growth, Market Cap, Return on Equity. Debt-to-equity of 14.28 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

FOR profiles as a value stock while RENX is a hypergrowth play — different risk/reward profiles.

RENX carries more volatility with a beta of 3.87 — expect wider price swings.

RENX is growing revenue faster at 42.3% — sustainability is the question.

RENX generates stronger free cash flow (-671,981), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

FOR scores higher overall (48/100 vs 31/100). Both earn "Hold" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Forestar Group Inc

REAL ESTATE · REAL ESTATE - DEVELOPMENT · USA

Forestar Group Inc. is a residential lot development company in the United States. The company is headquartered in Arlington, Texas.

RenX Enterprises Corp.

REAL ESTATE · REAL ESTATE - DEVELOPMENT · USA

RELX NV, through its interest in RELX Group plc, provides information and analysis for professional and commercial clients in all industries globally. The company is headquartered in Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?