WallStSmart

Forestar Group Inc (FOR)vsJFB Construction Holdings Class A Common Stock (JFB)

VS
⚡

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Forestar Group Inc generates 3940% more annual revenue ($1.72B vs $42.70M). FOR leads profitability with a 9.9% profit margin vs -23.9%. FOR earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 52/100 (C-).

FOR

Buy

52

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 4.7Profit: 6.0Value: 7.3Quality: 5.0
Piotroski: 1/9Altman Z: 1.99

JFB

Avoid

29

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 5.3Profit: 2.0Value: 5.0Quality: 8.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 11.58
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

FORUndervalued (+69.5%)

Margin of Safety

+69.5%

Fair Value

$96.88

Current Price

$25.92

$70.96 discount

UndervaluedFair: $96.88Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for JFB.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

FOR2 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
7.7x10/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
0.7x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

JFB4 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
146.2%10/10

Revenue surging 146.2% year-over-year

Debt/EquityHealth
0.0410/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
11.5810/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

Price/BookValuation
2.0x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Areas to Watch

FOR4 concerns · Avg: 3.5/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
4.2%4/10

4.2% revenue growth

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.994/10

Grey zone — moderate risk

Market CapQuality
$1.31B3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
1/93/10

Weak financial health signals

JFB4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Market CapQuality
$100.04M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Return on EquityProfitability
-18.5%2/10

ROE of -18.5% — below average capital efficiency

EPS GrowthGrowth
-76.3%2/10

Earnings declined 76.3%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : FOR

The strongest argument for FOR centers on P/E Ratio, Price/Book.

Bull Case : JFB

The strongest argument for JFB centers on Revenue Growth, Debt/Equity, Altman Z-Score. Revenue growth of 146.2% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : FOR

The primary concerns for FOR are Revenue Growth, Altman Z-Score, Market Cap.

Bear Case : JFB

The primary concerns for JFB are Market Cap, Piotroski F-Score, Return on Equity.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

FOR profiles as a value stock while JFB is a hypergrowth play — different risk/reward profiles.

JFB is growing revenue faster at 146.2% — sustainability is the question.

FOR generates stronger free cash flow (32M), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor REAL ESTATE - DEVELOPMENT industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

FOR scores higher overall (52/100 vs 29/100). Both earn "Buy" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Forestar Group Inc

REAL ESTATE · REAL ESTATE - DEVELOPMENT · USA

Forestar Group Inc. is a residential lot development company in the United States. The company is headquartered in Arlington, Texas.

JFB Construction Holdings Class A Common Stock

REAL ESTATE · REAL ESTATE - DEVELOPMENT · USA

JFB Construction Holdings is a commercial and residential real estate construction and development company. The company is headquartered in Lantana, Florida.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?