WallStSmart

Forestar Group Inc (FOR)vsJFB Construction Holdings Class A Common Stock (JFB)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Forestar Group Inc generates 7664% more annual revenue ($1.69B vs $21.70M). FOR leads profitability with a 9.9% profit margin vs -14.1%. FOR earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 48/100 (D+).

FOR

Hold

48

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 4.0Profit: 6.0Value: 4.7Quality: 5.0

JFB

Avoid

11

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 2.0Profit: 2.0Value: 5.0Quality: 8.5
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 5.60
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

FORSignificantly Overvalued (-32.7%)

Margin of Safety

-32.7%

Fair Value

$22.24

Current Price

$25.32

$3.08 premium

UndervaluedFair: $22.24Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for JFB.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

FOR2 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
7.7x10/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
0.7x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

JFB2 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Debt/EquityHealth
0.0610/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
5.6010/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

Areas to Watch

FOR4 concerns · Avg: 2.3/10
Market CapQuality
$1.29B3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

PEG RatioValuation
4.902/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

EPS GrowthGrowth
-6.3%2/10

Earnings declined 6.3%

Free Cash FlowQuality
$-157.10M2/10

Negative free cash flow — burning cash

JFB4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
Price/BookValuation
16.8x4/10

Trading at 16.8x book value

Market CapQuality
$115.47M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Return on EquityProfitability
-34.6%2/10

ROE of -34.6% — below average capital efficiency

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : FOR

The strongest argument for FOR centers on P/E Ratio, Price/Book.

Bull Case : JFB

The strongest argument for JFB centers on Debt/Equity, Altman Z-Score.

Bear Case : FOR

The primary concerns for FOR are Market Cap, PEG Ratio, EPS Growth.

Bear Case : JFB

The primary concerns for JFB are Price/Book, Market Cap, Piotroski F-Score.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

FOR profiles as a value stock while JFB is a turnaround play — different risk/reward profiles.

FOR is growing revenue faster at 9.0% — sustainability is the question.

JFB generates stronger free cash flow (-763,467), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor REAL ESTATE - DEVELOPMENT industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

FOR scores higher overall (48/100 vs 11/100). Both earn "Hold" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Forestar Group Inc

REAL ESTATE · REAL ESTATE - DEVELOPMENT · USA

Forestar Group Inc. is a residential lot development company in the United States. The company is headquartered in Arlington, Texas.

JFB Construction Holdings Class A Common Stock

REAL ESTATE · REAL ESTATE - DEVELOPMENT · USA

JFB Construction Holdings is a commercial and residential real estate construction and development company. The company is headquartered in Lantana, Florida.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?