WallStSmart

Forestar Group Inc (FOR)vsIron Mountain Incorporated (IRM)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Iron Mountain Incorporated generates 310% more annual revenue ($6.90B vs $1.69B). FOR leads profitability with a 9.9% profit margin vs 2.1%. IRM appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 2.70. IRM earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 52/100 (C-).

FOR

Buy

51

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 4.7Profit: 5.5Value: 7.3Quality: 5.0

IRM

Buy

52

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 6.0Profit: 7.0Value: 2.0Quality: 3.3
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 0.12
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

FORUndervalued (+78.8%)

Margin of Safety

+78.8%

Fair Value

$138.91

Current Price

$26.63

$112.28 discount

UndervaluedFair: $138.91Overvalued
IRMSignificantly Overvalued (-2847.7%)

Margin of Safety

-2847.7%

Fair Value

$3.40

Current Price

$118.07

$114.67 premium

UndervaluedFair: $3.40Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

FOR3 strengths · Avg: 9.3/10
P/E RatioValuation
8.1x10/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
0.8x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

EPS GrowthGrowth
22.3%8/10

Earnings expanding 22.3% YoY

IRM3 strengths · Avg: 8.7/10
Return on EquityProfitability
225.1%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 225 in profit

Operating MarginProfitability
22.0%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 22.0%

Revenue GrowthGrowth
16.6%8/10

16.6% revenue growth

Areas to Watch

FOR4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Market CapQuality
$1.36B3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Operating MarginProfitability
4.7%3/10

Operating margin of 4.7%

PEG RatioValuation
4.902/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-3.0%2/10

Revenue declined 3.0%

IRM4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Profit MarginProfitability
2.1%3/10

2.1% margin — thin

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
2.702/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

P/E RatioValuation
236.1x2/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : FOR

The strongest argument for FOR centers on P/E Ratio, Price/Book, EPS Growth.

Bull Case : IRM

The strongest argument for IRM centers on Return on Equity, Operating Margin, Revenue Growth. Revenue growth of 16.6% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : FOR

The primary concerns for FOR are Market Cap, Operating Margin, PEG Ratio.

Bear Case : IRM

The primary concerns for IRM are Profit Margin, Piotroski F-Score, PEG Ratio. A P/E of 236.1x leaves little room for execution misses. Thin 2.1% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

FOR profiles as a value stock while IRM is a growth play — different risk/reward profiles.

FOR carries more volatility with a beta of 1.45 — expect wider price swings.

IRM is growing revenue faster at 16.6% — sustainability is the question.

IRM generates stronger free cash flow (-16M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

IRM scores higher overall (52/100 vs 51/100) and 16.6% revenue growth. FOR offers better value entry with a 78.8% margin of safety. Both earn "Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Forestar Group Inc

REAL ESTATE · REAL ESTATE - DEVELOPMENT · USA

Forestar Group Inc. is a residential lot development company in the United States. The company is headquartered in Arlington, Texas.

Iron Mountain Incorporated

REAL ESTATE · REIT - SPECIALTY · USA

Iron Mountain Inc. (NYSE: IRM) is an American enterprise information management services company founded in 1951 and headquartered in Boston, Massachusetts.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?