WallStSmart

Forestar Group Inc (FOR)vsIron Mountain Incorporated (IRM)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Iron Mountain Incorporated generates 324% more annual revenue ($7.25B vs $1.71B). FOR leads profitability with a 9.8% profit margin vs 3.8%. IRM appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 2.70. IRM earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 64/100 (C+).

FOR

Buy

51

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 4.7Profit: 5.5Value: 7.3Quality: 4.5
Piotroski: 1/9Altman Z: 1.99

IRM

Buy

64

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 8.7Profit: 7.0Value: 2.0Quality: 6.5
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 0.10
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

FORUndervalued (+70.3%)

Margin of Safety

+70.3%

Fair Value

$99.38

Current Price

$27.47

$71.91 discount

UndervaluedFair: $99.38Overvalued
IRMSignificantly Overvalued (-41.9%)

Margin of Safety

-41.9%

Fair Value

$70.64

Current Price

$128.25

$57.61 premium

UndervaluedFair: $70.64Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

FOR3 strengths · Avg: 9.3/10
P/E RatioValuation
8.4x10/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
0.8x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

EPS GrowthGrowth
22.3%8/10

Earnings expanding 22.3% YoY

IRM5 strengths · Avg: 9.2/10
Return on EquityProfitability
225.1%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 225 in profit

EPS GrowthGrowth
860.0%10/10

Earnings expanding 860.0% YoY

Debt/EquityHealth
-16.2310/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Operating MarginProfitability
21.0%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 21.0%

Revenue GrowthGrowth
21.6%8/10

Revenue surging 21.6% year-over-year

Areas to Watch

FOR4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.994/10

Grey zone — moderate risk

Market CapQuality
$1.40B3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Operating MarginProfitability
4.7%3/10

Operating margin of 4.7%

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
1/93/10

Weak financial health signals

IRM4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Profit MarginProfitability
3.8%3/10

3.8% margin — thin

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
2.702/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

P/E RatioValuation
139.4x2/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : FOR

The strongest argument for FOR centers on P/E Ratio, Price/Book, EPS Growth.

Bull Case : IRM

The strongest argument for IRM centers on Return on Equity, EPS Growth, Debt/Equity. Revenue growth of 21.6% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : FOR

The primary concerns for FOR are Altman Z-Score, Market Cap, Operating Margin.

Bear Case : IRM

The primary concerns for IRM are Profit Margin, Piotroski F-Score, PEG Ratio. A P/E of 139.4x leaves little room for execution misses. Thin 3.8% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

FOR profiles as a value stock while IRM is a growth play — different risk/reward profiles.

FOR carries more volatility with a beta of 1.45 — expect wider price swings.

IRM is growing revenue faster at 21.6% — sustainability is the question.

FOR generates stronger free cash flow (152M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

IRM scores higher overall (64/100 vs 51/100) and 21.6% revenue growth. FOR offers better value entry with a 70.3% margin of safety. Both earn "Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Forestar Group Inc

REAL ESTATE · REAL ESTATE - DEVELOPMENT · USA

Forestar Group Inc. is a residential lot development company in the United States. The company is headquartered in Arlington, Texas.

Iron Mountain Incorporated

REAL ESTATE · REIT - SPECIALTY · USA

Iron Mountain Inc. (NYSE: IRM) is an American enterprise information management services company founded in 1951 and headquartered in Boston, Massachusetts.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?