WallStSmart

Diamondback Energy Inc (FANG)vsLockheed Martin Corporation (LMT)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Lockheed Martin Corporation generates 419% more annual revenue ($75.11B vs $14.47B). LMT leads profitability with a 6.4% profit margin vs 2.0%. LMT appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.09. LMT earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 55/100 (C-).

FANG

Hold

41

out of 100

Grade: D

Growth: 5.3Profit: 4.0Value: 4.7Quality: 3.3
Piotroski: 1/9Altman Z: 1.24

LMT

Buy

55

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 3.3Profit: 6.5Value: 4.7Quality: 4.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 2.09
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

FANGUndervalued (+44.7%)

Margin of Safety

+44.7%

Fair Value

$305.77

Current Price

$188.70

$117.07 discount

UndervaluedFair: $305.77Overvalued
LMTSignificantly Overvalued (-37.1%)

Margin of Safety

-37.1%

Fair Value

$458.56

Current Price

$506.51

$47.95 premium

UndervaluedFair: $458.56Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

FANG2 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
Price/BookValuation
1.5x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Market CapQuality
$53.58B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

LMT2 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
Return on EquityProfitability
67.6%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 68 in profit

Market CapQuality
$116.78B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Areas to Watch

FANG4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
Return on EquityProfitability
0.5%3/10

ROE of 0.5% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
2.0%3/10

2.0% margin — thin

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
1/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
57.132/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

LMT4 concerns · Avg: 3.5/10
Price/BookValuation
15.6x4/10

Trading at 15.6x book value

Revenue GrowthGrowth
0.3%4/10

0.3% revenue growth

Profit MarginProfitability
6.4%3/10

6.4% margin — thin

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : FANG

The strongest argument for FANG centers on Price/Book, Market Cap.

Bull Case : LMT

The strongest argument for LMT centers on Return on Equity, Market Cap. PEG of 1.09 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : FANG

The primary concerns for FANG are Return on Equity, Profit Margin, Piotroski F-Score. A P/E of 196.3x leaves little room for execution misses. Thin 2.0% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Bear Case : LMT

The primary concerns for LMT are Price/Book, Revenue Growth, Profit Margin. Debt-to-equity of 3.23 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

FANG carries more volatility with a beta of 0.44 — expect wider price swings.

FANG is growing revenue faster at 9.1% — sustainability is the question.

FANG generates stronger free cash flow (895M), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor OIL & GAS E&P industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

LMT scores higher overall (55/100 vs 41/100). FANG offers better value entry with a 44.7% margin of safety. Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Diamondback Energy Inc

ENERGY · OIL & GAS E&P · USA

Diamondback Energy is a company engaged in hydrocarbon exploration and headquartered in Midland, Texas.

Lockheed Martin Corporation

INDUSTRIALS · AEROSPACE & DEFENSE · USA

Lockheed Martin Corporation is an American aerospace, defense, information security, and technology company with worldwide interests. It is headquartered in North Bethesda, Maryland, in the Washington, D.C., area.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?