WallStSmart

ConocoPhillips (COP)vsLockheed Martin Corporation (LMT)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Lockheed Martin Corporation generates 26% more annual revenue ($75.11B vs $59.38B). COP leads profitability with a 12.3% profit margin vs 6.4%. LMT appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.09. COP earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 56/100 (C).

COP

Buy

56

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 2.0Profit: 6.5Value: 4.7Quality: 5.0

LMT

Buy

55

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 3.3Profit: 6.5Value: 4.7Quality: 4.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 2.09
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

COPSignificantly Overvalued (-50.4%)

Margin of Safety

-50.4%

Fair Value

$73.94

Current Price

$113.87

$39.93 premium

UndervaluedFair: $73.94Overvalued
LMTSignificantly Overvalued (-37.1%)

Margin of Safety

-37.1%

Fair Value

$458.56

Current Price

$506.51

$47.95 premium

UndervaluedFair: $458.56Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

COP4 strengths · Avg: 8.3/10
Market CapQuality
$139.96B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Price/BookValuation
2.1x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Operating MarginProfitability
22.1%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 22.1%

Free Cash FlowQuality
$1.35B8/10

Generating 1.3B in free cash flow

LMT2 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
Return on EquityProfitability
67.6%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 68 in profit

Market CapQuality
$116.78B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Areas to Watch

COP2 concerns · Avg: 2.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
-5.3%2/10

Revenue declined 5.3%

EPS GrowthGrowth
-20.2%2/10

Earnings declined 20.2%

LMT4 concerns · Avg: 3.5/10
Price/BookValuation
15.6x4/10

Trading at 15.6x book value

Revenue GrowthGrowth
0.3%4/10

0.3% revenue growth

Profit MarginProfitability
6.4%3/10

6.4% margin — thin

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : COP

The strongest argument for COP centers on Market Cap, Price/Book, Operating Margin. PEG of 1.14 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : LMT

The strongest argument for LMT centers on Return on Equity, Market Cap. PEG of 1.09 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : COP

The primary concerns for COP are Revenue Growth, EPS Growth.

Bear Case : LMT

The primary concerns for LMT are Price/Book, Revenue Growth, Profit Margin. Debt-to-equity of 3.23 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

COP profiles as a declining stock while LMT is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

COP carries more volatility with a beta of 0.15 — expect wider price swings.

LMT is growing revenue faster at 0.3% — sustainability is the question.

COP generates stronger free cash flow (1.3B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

COP scores higher overall (56/100 vs 55/100). Both earn "Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

ConocoPhillips

ENERGY · OIL & GAS E&P · USA

ConocoPhillips is an American multinational corporation engaged in hydrocarbon exploration. It is based in the Energy Corridor district of Houston, Texas.

Lockheed Martin Corporation

INDUSTRIALS · AEROSPACE & DEFENSE · USA

Lockheed Martin Corporation is an American aerospace, defense, information security, and technology company with worldwide interests. It is headquartered in North Bethesda, Maryland, in the Washington, D.C., area.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?