WallStSmart

ConocoPhillips (COP)vsEQT Corporation (EQT)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

ConocoPhillips generates 637% more annual revenue ($60.28B vs $8.18B). EQT leads profitability with a 24.9% profit margin vs 13.3%. COP appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 3.16. EQT earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 72/100 (B).

COP

Hold

48

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 2.0Profit: 6.5Value: 4.7Quality: 5.0

EQT

Strong Buy

72

out of 100

Grade: B

Growth: 6.7Profit: 7.5Value: 7.3Quality: 6.0
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 1.50
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

COPSignificantly Overvalued (-157.6%)

Margin of Safety

-157.6%

Fair Value

$43.18

Current Price

$126.92

$83.74 premium

UndervaluedFair: $43.18Overvalued
EQTUndervalued (+63.3%)

Margin of Safety

+63.3%

Fair Value

$154.91

Current Price

$64.67

$90.24 discount

UndervaluedFair: $154.91Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

COP3 strengths · Avg: 8.3/10
Market CapQuality
$150.19B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Price/BookValuation
2.4x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Free Cash FlowQuality
$1.29B8/10

Generating 1.3B in free cash flow

EQT5 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Operating MarginProfitability
55.0%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 55.0%

EPS GrowthGrowth
54.6%10/10

Earnings expanding 54.6% YoY

Profit MarginProfitability
24.9%9/10

Keeps 25 of every $100 in revenue as profit

Price/BookValuation
1.7x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Revenue GrowthGrowth
26.9%8/10

Revenue surging 26.9% year-over-year

Areas to Watch

COP3 concerns · Avg: 2.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
3.162/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-6.8%2/10

Revenue declined 6.8%

EPS GrowthGrowth
-39.0%2/10

Earnings declined 39.0%

EQT2 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.504/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

PEG RatioValuation
7.132/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : COP

The strongest argument for COP centers on Market Cap, Price/Book, Free Cash Flow.

Bull Case : EQT

The strongest argument for EQT centers on Operating Margin, EPS Growth, Profit Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 24.9% and operating margin at 55.0%. Revenue growth of 26.9% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : COP

The primary concerns for COP are PEG Ratio, Revenue Growth, EPS Growth.

Bear Case : EQT

The primary concerns for EQT are Altman Z-Score, PEG Ratio.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

COP profiles as a declining stock while EQT is a growth play — different risk/reward profiles.

EQT carries more volatility with a beta of 0.72 — expect wider price swings.

EQT is growing revenue faster at 26.9% — sustainability is the question.

COP generates stronger free cash flow (1.3B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

EQT scores higher overall (72/100 vs 48/100), backed by strong 24.9% margins and 26.9% revenue growth. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

ConocoPhillips

ENERGY · OIL & GAS E&P · USA

ConocoPhillips is an American multinational corporation engaged in hydrocarbon exploration. It is based in the Energy Corridor district of Houston, Texas.

EQT Corporation

ENERGY · OIL & GAS E&P · USA

EQT Corporation is a natural gas production company in the United States. The company is headquartered in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?