WallStSmart

ConocoPhillips (COP)vsEQT Corporation (EQT)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

ConocoPhillips generates 594% more annual revenue ($64.46B vs $9.29B). EQT leads profitability with a 29.2% profit margin vs 14.4%. COP appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.24. COP earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 78/100 (B+).

COP

Strong Buy

78

out of 100

Grade: B+

Growth: 7.3Profit: 7.0Value: 5.7Quality: 7.0
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 2.36

EQT

Buy

61

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 2.0Profit: 7.5Value: 6.0Quality: 6.5
Piotroski: 6/9Altman Z: 1.74
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

Intrinsic value data unavailable for COP.

EQTUndervalued (+7.6%)

Margin of Safety

+7.6%

Fair Value

$59.67

Current Price

$54.07

$5.60 discount

UndervaluedFair: $59.67Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

COP6 strengths · Avg: 9.2/10
Operating MarginProfitability
31.5%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 31.5%

Revenue GrowthGrowth
35.5%10/10

Revenue surging 35.5% year-over-year

EPS GrowthGrowth
107.0%10/10

Earnings expanding 107.0% YoY

Market CapQuality
$165.00B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Price/BookValuation
2.5x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Free Cash FlowQuality
$4.41B8/10

Generating 4.4B in free cash flow

EQT5 strengths · Avg: 8.8/10
Price/BookValuation
1.3x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Profit MarginProfitability
29.2%9/10

Keeps 29 of every $100 in revenue as profit

Debt/EquityHealth
0.229/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

P/E RatioValuation
12.8x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Operating MarginProfitability
23.4%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 23.4%

Areas to Watch

COP0 concerns · Avg: 0/10

No major concerns identified

EQT4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.824/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.744/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-3.9%2/10

Revenue declined 3.9%

EPS GrowthGrowth
-74.0%2/10

Earnings declined 74.0%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : COP

The strongest argument for COP centers on Operating Margin, Revenue Growth, EPS Growth. Revenue growth of 35.5% demonstrates continued momentum. PEG of 1.24 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : EQT

The strongest argument for EQT centers on Price/Book, Profit Margin, Debt/Equity. Profitability is solid with margins at 29.2% and operating margin at 23.4%.

Bear Case : COP

No major red flags identified for COP, but monitor valuation.

Bear Case : EQT

The primary concerns for EQT are PEG Ratio, Altman Z-Score, Revenue Growth.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

COP profiles as a growth stock while EQT is a declining play — different risk/reward profiles.

EQT carries more volatility with a beta of 0.58 — expect wider price swings.

COP is growing revenue faster at 35.5% — sustainability is the question.

COP generates stronger free cash flow (4.4B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

COP scores higher overall (78/100 vs 61/100) and 35.5% revenue growth. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

ConocoPhillips

ENERGY · OIL & GAS E&P · USA

ConocoPhillips is an American multinational corporation engaged in hydrocarbon exploration. It is based in the Energy Corridor district of Houston, Texas.

EQT Corporation

ENERGY · OIL & GAS E&P · USA

EQT Corporation is a natural gas production company in the United States. The company is headquartered in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?