WallStSmart

EPAM Systems Inc (EPAM)vsSony Group Corp (SONY)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Sony Group Corp generates 241244% more annual revenue ($13.17T vs $5.46B). EPAM leads profitability with a 6.9% profit margin vs -1.6%. EPAM appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.66. EPAM earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 66/100 (B-).

EPAM

Strong Buy

66

out of 100

Grade: B-

Growth: 5.3Profit: 5.5Value: 8.7Quality: 8.0
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 4.28

SONY

Hold

47

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 5.3Profit: 5.0Value: 5.0Quality: 5.0
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

EPAMUndervalued (+57.1%)

Margin of Safety

+57.1%

Fair Value

$414.58

Current Price

$99.23

$315.35 discount

UndervaluedFair: $414.58Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for SONY.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

EPAM5 strengths · Avg: 9.2/10
Price/BookValuation
1.5x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Debt/EquityHealth
0.0410/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
4.2810/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

PEG RatioValuation
0.668/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

P/E RatioValuation
15.0x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

SONY4 strengths · Avg: 8.8/10
Free Cash FlowQuality
$898.45B10/10

Generating 898.5B in free cash flow

Market CapQuality
$122.47B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

P/E RatioValuation
15.8x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
2.3x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Areas to Watch

EPAM3 concerns · Avg: 2.7/10
Profit MarginProfitability
6.9%3/10

6.9% margin — thin

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Free Cash FlowQuality
$-54.22M2/10

Negative free cash flow — burning cash

SONY3 concerns · Avg: 2.3/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
0.5%4/10

0.5% revenue growth

PEG RatioValuation
2.652/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Profit MarginProfitability
-1.6%1/10

Currently unprofitable

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : EPAM

The strongest argument for EPAM centers on Price/Book, Debt/Equity, Altman Z-Score. Revenue growth of 12.8% demonstrates continued momentum. PEG of 0.66 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : SONY

The strongest argument for SONY centers on Free Cash Flow, Market Cap, P/E Ratio.

Bear Case : EPAM

The primary concerns for EPAM are Profit Margin, Piotroski F-Score, Free Cash Flow.

Bear Case : SONY

The primary concerns for SONY are Revenue Growth, PEG Ratio, Profit Margin.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

EPAM profiles as a value stock while SONY is a turnaround play — different risk/reward profiles.

EPAM carries more volatility with a beta of 1.45 — expect wider price swings.

EPAM is growing revenue faster at 12.8% — sustainability is the question.

SONY generates stronger free cash flow (898.5B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

EPAM scores higher overall (66/100 vs 47/100) and 12.8% revenue growth. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

EPAM Systems Inc

TECHNOLOGY · INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SERVICES · USA

EPAM Systems, Inc. provides digital platform engineering and software development services in North America, Europe, Russia, Belarus, Kazakhstan, Ukraine, Georgia, East Asia, Southeast Asia, and Australia. The company is headquartered in Newtown, Pennsylvania.

Visit Website →

Sony Group Corp

TECHNOLOGY · CONSUMER ELECTRONICS · USA

Sony Group Corporation designs, develops, produces and sells electronic equipment, instruments and devices for the consumer, professional and industrial markets worldwide. The company is headquartered in Tokyo, Japan.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?