WallStSmart

Cognizant Technology Solutions Corp Class A (CTSH)vsEPAM Systems Inc (EPAM)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Cognizant Technology Solutions Corp Class A generates 287% more annual revenue ($21.11B vs $5.46B). CTSH leads profitability with a 10.6% profit margin vs 6.9%. EPAM appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.82. CTSH earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 71/100 (B).

CTSH

Strong Buy

71

out of 100

Grade: B

Growth: 5.3Profit: 7.5Value: 10.0Quality: 5.5
Piotroski: 2/9

EPAM

Buy

63

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 5.3Profit: 5.5Value: 7.3Quality: 8.0
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 4.28
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

CTSHUndervalued (+63.1%)

Margin of Safety

+63.1%

Fair Value

$192.25

Current Price

$59.79

$132.46 discount

UndervaluedFair: $192.25Overvalued
EPAMSignificantly Overvalued (-19.3%)

Margin of Safety

-19.3%

Fair Value

$149.20

Current Price

$133.26

$15.94 premium

UndervaluedFair: $149.20Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CTSH3 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
13.1x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
1.9x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

EPS GrowthGrowth
22.1%8/10

Earnings expanding 22.1% YoY

EPAM4 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Debt/EquityHealth
0.0410/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
4.2810/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

PEG RatioValuation
0.828/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

Price/BookValuation
2.0x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Areas to Watch

CTSH2 concerns · Avg: 3.5/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
4.9%4/10

4.9% revenue growth

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

EPAM2 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
Profit MarginProfitability
6.9%3/10

6.9% margin — thin

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CTSH

The strongest argument for CTSH centers on P/E Ratio, Price/Book, EPS Growth. PEG of 1.02 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : EPAM

The strongest argument for EPAM centers on Debt/Equity, Altman Z-Score, PEG Ratio. Revenue growth of 12.8% demonstrates continued momentum. PEG of 0.82 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : CTSH

The primary concerns for CTSH are Revenue Growth, Piotroski F-Score.

Bear Case : EPAM

The primary concerns for EPAM are Profit Margin, Piotroski F-Score.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

EPAM carries more volatility with a beta of 1.77 — expect wider price swings.

EPAM is growing revenue faster at 12.8% — sustainability is the question.

CTSH generates stronger free cash flow (781M), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SERVICES industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

CTSH scores higher overall (71/100 vs 63/100). Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Cognizant Technology Solutions Corp Class A

TECHNOLOGY · INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SERVICES · USA

Cognizant is an American multinational technology company that provides business consulting, information technology and outsourcing services. It is headquartered in Teaneck, New Jersey, United States.

EPAM Systems Inc

TECHNOLOGY · INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SERVICES · USA

EPAM Systems, Inc. provides digital platform engineering and software development services in North America, Europe, Russia, Belarus, Kazakhstan, Ukraine, Georgia, East Asia, Southeast Asia, and Australia. The company is headquartered in Newtown, Pennsylvania.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?