BRP Inc. (DOO)vsPatrick Industries Inc (PATK)
DOO
BRP Inc.
$60.70
-3.37%
CONSUMER CYCLICAL · Cap: $4.45B
PATK
Patrick Industries Inc
$85.12
-1.08%
CONSUMER CYCLICAL · Cap: $2.85B
Smart Verdict
WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison
BRP Inc. generates 128% more annual revenue ($8.99B vs $3.94B). PATK leads profitability with a 3.5% profit margin vs 3.0%. DOO appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.07. DOO earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 58/100 (C).
DOO
Buy58
out of 100
Grade: C
PATK
Hold44
out of 100
Grade: D
Intrinsic Value Comparison
Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula
Margin of Safety
-6.8%
Fair Value
$74.08
Current Price
$60.70
$13.38 premium
Intrinsic value data unavailable for PATK.
Key Strengths & Concerns
Side-by-side fundamental analysis
Key Strengths
Every $100 of equity generates 39 in profit
Revenue surging 29.5% year-over-year
Conservative balance sheet, low leverage
Reasonable price relative to book value
Areas to Watch
Trading at 10.1x book value
3.0% margin — thin
Earnings declined 14.2%
3.5% margin — thin
Expensive relative to growth rate
Revenue declined 0.6%
Earnings declined 0.9%
Comparative Analysis Report
WallStSmart ResearchBull Case : DOO
The strongest argument for DOO centers on Return on Equity, Revenue Growth. Revenue growth of 29.5% demonstrates continued momentum. PEG of 1.07 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.
Bull Case : PATK
The strongest argument for PATK centers on Debt/Equity, Price/Book.
Bear Case : DOO
The primary concerns for DOO are Price/Book, Profit Margin, EPS Growth. Thin 3.0% margins leave little buffer for downturns.
Bear Case : PATK
The primary concerns for PATK are Profit Margin, PEG Ratio, Revenue Growth. Thin 3.5% margins leave little buffer for downturns.
Key Dynamics to Monitor
DOO profiles as a growth stock while PATK is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.
PATK carries more volatility with a beta of 1.09 — expect wider price swings.
DOO is growing revenue faster at 29.5% — sustainability is the question.
DOO generates stronger free cash flow (367M), providing more financial flexibility.
Bottom Line
DOO scores higher overall (58/100 vs 44/100) and 29.5% revenue growth. Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.
This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.
BRP Inc.
CONSUMER CYCLICAL · RECREATIONAL VEHICLES · USA
BRP Inc. (DOO) stands as a leading global manufacturer in the powersports industry, celebrated for its innovation and high-quality craftsmanship across a diverse brand portfolio that includes Ski-Doo, Sea-Doo, and Can-Am products. Headquartered in Valcourt, Quebec, the company has established a strong commitment to sustainability and technological advancements that reinforce its competitive edge in an expanding market. With an emphasis on research and development, BRP not only enhances consumer experiences but also strategically expands its global footprint through an extensive distribution and service network, positioning itself for continued growth and market leadership.
Visit Website →Patrick Industries Inc
CONSUMER CYCLICAL · RECREATIONAL VEHICLES · USA
Patrick Industries Inc. (PATK), headquartered in Elkhart, Indiana, is a leading manufacturer and distributor of a diverse array of component products tailored for the recreational vehicle, marine, manufactured housing, and industrial markets. The company boasts an extensive product portfolio that includes cabinetry, decorative surfaces, and building materials, leveraging its deep industry knowledge to enhance operational efficiencies and promote innovation. With a strong commitment to sustainability and a strategic focus on acquisitions, Patrick Industries is strategically positioned to meet the growing consumer demand in the recreational vehicle sector, offering promising avenues for sustainable growth and value creation for institutional investors.
Visit Website →Compare with Other RECREATIONAL VEHICLES Stocks
Want to dig deeper into these stocks?