WallStSmart

Lithia Motors Inc (LAD)vsRush Enterprises B Inc (RUSHB)

VS
⚡

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Lithia Motors Inc generates 428% more annual revenue ($38.21B vs $7.24B). RUSHB leads profitability with a 3.7% profit margin vs 2.1%. LAD appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.58. LAD earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 68/100 (B-).

LAD

Strong Buy

68

out of 100

Grade: B-

Growth: 7.3Profit: 5.0Value: 8.0Quality: 4.0
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 2.38

RUSHB

Buy

54

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 6.0Profit: 5.0Value: 4.0Quality: 6.0
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 3.34
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

LADUndervalued (+12.2%)

Margin of Safety

+12.2%

Fair Value

$364.90

Current Price

$309.66

$55.24 discount

UndervaluedFair: $364.90Overvalued
RUSHBFair Value (-3.7%)

Margin of Safety

-3.7%

Fair Value

$63.04

Current Price

$59.14

$3.90 premium

UndervaluedFair: $63.04Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

LAD4 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
P/E RatioValuation
8.3x10/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
1.0x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

EPS GrowthGrowth
53.5%10/10

Earnings expanding 53.5% YoY

PEG RatioValuation
0.588/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

RUSHB2 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Altman Z-ScoreHealth
3.3410/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

Price/BookValuation
2.9x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Areas to Watch

LAD4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
2.8%4/10

2.8% revenue growth

Profit MarginProfitability
2.1%3/10

2.1% margin — thin

Operating MarginProfitability
4.2%3/10

Operating margin of 4.2%

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

RUSHB4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
Profit MarginProfitability
3.7%3/10

3.7% margin — thin

Operating MarginProfitability
0.0%3/10

Operating margin of 0.0%

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
2.742/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : LAD

The strongest argument for LAD centers on P/E Ratio, Price/Book, EPS Growth. PEG of 0.58 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : RUSHB

The strongest argument for RUSHB centers on Altman Z-Score, Price/Book. Revenue growth of 12.4% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : LAD

The primary concerns for LAD are Revenue Growth, Profit Margin, Operating Margin. Debt-to-equity of 2.43 is elevated, increasing financial risk. Thin 2.1% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Bear Case : RUSHB

The primary concerns for RUSHB are Profit Margin, Operating Margin, Piotroski F-Score. Thin 3.7% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

LAD carries more volatility with a beta of 1.26 — expect wider price swings.

RUSHB is growing revenue faster at 12.4% — sustainability is the question.

RUSHB generates stronger free cash flow (51M), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor AUTO & TRUCK DEALERSHIPS industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

LAD scores higher overall (68/100 vs 54/100). Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Lithia Motors Inc

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · AUTO & TRUCK DEALERSHIPS · USA

Lithia Motors, Inc. is an automobile retailer in the United States. The company is headquartered in Medford, Oregon.

Rush Enterprises B Inc

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · AUTO & TRUCK DEALERSHIPS · USA

Rush Enterprises, Inc. is an integrated retailer of commercial vehicles and related services in the United States. The company is headquartered in New Braunfels, Texas.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?