WallStSmart

Citi Trends Inc (CTRN)vsLululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Lululemon Athletica Inc. generates 1175% more annual revenue ($11.09B vs $869.97M). LULU leads profitability with a 12.8% profit margin vs 0.8%. LULU appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.77. LULU earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 62/100 (C+).

CTRN

Buy

54

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 6.7Profit: 3.5Value: 2.0Quality: 5.0
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 2.86

LULU

Buy

62

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 4.0Profit: 7.5Value: 9.3Quality: 7.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 4.12
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

CTRNSignificantly Overvalued (-37.4%)

Margin of Safety

-37.4%

Fair Value

$33.55

Current Price

$60.62

$27.07 premium

UndervaluedFair: $33.55Overvalued
LULUUndervalued (+70.5%)

Margin of Safety

+70.5%

Fair Value

$597.24

Current Price

$98.97

$498.27 discount

UndervaluedFair: $597.24Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CTRN1 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
739.0%10/10

Earnings expanding 739.0% YoY

LULU5 strengths · Avg: 9.2/10
P/E RatioValuation
8.5x10/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Return on EquityProfitability
30.3%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 30 in profit

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
4.1210/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

PEG RatioValuation
0.778/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

Price/BookValuation
2.3x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Areas to Watch

CTRN4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
Market CapQuality
$505.54M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Return on EquityProfitability
5.9%3/10

ROE of 5.9% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
0.8%3/10

0.8% margin — thin

Debt/EquityHealth
1.453/10

Elevated debt levels

LULU3 concerns · Avg: 2.3/10
Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-4.3%2/10

Revenue declined 4.3%

EPS GrowthGrowth
-5.9%2/10

Earnings declined 5.9%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CTRN

The strongest argument for CTRN centers on EPS Growth. Revenue growth of 10.9% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : LULU

The strongest argument for LULU centers on P/E Ratio, Return on Equity, Altman Z-Score. PEG of 0.77 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : CTRN

The primary concerns for CTRN are Market Cap, Return on Equity, Profit Margin. A P/E of 70.5x leaves little room for execution misses. Thin 0.8% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Bear Case : LULU

The primary concerns for LULU are Piotroski F-Score, Revenue Growth, EPS Growth.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

CTRN profiles as a value stock while LULU is a declining play — different risk/reward profiles.

CTRN carries more volatility with a beta of 1.82 — expect wider price swings.

CTRN is growing revenue faster at 10.9% — sustainability is the question.

LULU generates stronger free cash flow (87M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

LULU scores higher overall (62/100 vs 54/100). Both earn "Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Citi Trends Inc

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · APPAREL RETAIL · USA

Citi Trends, Inc. is a retailer of affordable fashion clothing, accessories and home goods. The company is headquartered in Savannah, Georgia.

Lululemon Athletica Inc.

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · APPAREL RETAIL · USA

lululemon athletica inc. The company is headquartered in Vancouver, Canada.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?