WallStSmart

Burlington Stores Inc (BURL)vsLululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Burlington Stores Inc generates 6% more annual revenue ($11.91B vs $11.20B). LULU leads profitability with a 13.0% profit margin vs 5.2%. LULU appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.58. LULU earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 64/100 (C+).

BURL

Buy

59

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 6.0Profit: 6.5Value: 2.7Quality: 4.5
Piotroski: 5/9Altman Z: 1.95

LULU

Buy

64

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 4.7Profit: 8.0Value: 9.3Quality: 7.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 4.12
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

BURLSignificantly Overvalued (-27.9%)

Margin of Safety

-27.9%

Fair Value

$239.08

Current Price

$317.05

$77.97 premium

UndervaluedFair: $239.08Overvalued
LULUUndervalued (+70.7%)

Margin of Safety

+70.7%

Fair Value

$600.18

Current Price

$114.23

$485.95 discount

UndervaluedFair: $600.18Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

BURL1 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Return on EquityProfitability
34.0%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 34 in profit

LULU5 strengths · Avg: 9.2/10
P/E RatioValuation
9.6x10/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Return on EquityProfitability
30.3%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 30 in profit

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
4.1210/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

PEG RatioValuation
0.588/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

Price/BookValuation
2.7x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Areas to Watch

BURL4 concerns · Avg: 3.8/10
P/E RatioValuation
34.9x4/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Price/BookValuation
10.7x4/10

Trading at 10.7x book value

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.954/10

Grey zone — moderate risk

Profit MarginProfitability
5.2%3/10

5.2% margin — thin

LULU3 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
4.3%4/10

4.3% revenue growth

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

EPS GrowthGrowth
-35.0%2/10

Earnings declined 35.0%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : BURL

The strongest argument for BURL centers on Return on Equity. Revenue growth of 14.1% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : LULU

The strongest argument for LULU centers on P/E Ratio, Return on Equity, Altman Z-Score. PEG of 0.58 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : BURL

The primary concerns for BURL are P/E Ratio, Price/Book, Altman Z-Score. Debt-to-equity of 3.20 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Bear Case : LULU

The primary concerns for LULU are Revenue Growth, Piotroski F-Score, EPS Growth.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

BURL carries more volatility with a beta of 1.46 — expect wider price swings.

BURL is growing revenue faster at 14.1% — sustainability is the question.

LULU generates stronger free cash flow (87M), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor APPAREL RETAIL industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

LULU scores higher overall (64/100 vs 59/100). Both earn "Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Burlington Stores Inc

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · APPAREL RETAIL · USA

Burlington Stores, Inc. is a branded apparel retailer in the United States. The company is headquartered in Burlington, New Jersey.

Lululemon Athletica Inc.

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · APPAREL RETAIL · USA

lululemon athletica inc. The company is headquartered in Vancouver, Canada.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?