WallStSmart

Criteo Sa (CRTO)vsWPP PLC ADR (WPP)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

WPP PLC ADR generates 597% more annual revenue ($13.55B vs $1.94B). CRTO leads profitability with a 7.4% profit margin vs -1.6%. CRTO appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.89. CRTO earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 59/100 (C).

CRTO

Buy

59

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 2.0Profit: 5.5Value: 8.0Quality: 7.5
Piotroski: 6/9Altman Z: 2.42

WPP

Avoid

35

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 2.0Profit: 3.0Value: 4.0Quality: 2.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 0.73
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

CRTOFair Value (-3.1%)

Margin of Safety

-3.1%

Fair Value

$17.95

Current Price

$17.72

$0.23 premium

UndervaluedFair: $17.95Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for WPP.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CRTO4 strengths · Avg: 9.3/10
P/E RatioValuation
6.4x10/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
0.8x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Debt/EquityHealth
0.139/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

PEG RatioValuation
0.898/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

WPP1 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
Free Cash FlowQuality
$1.71B8/10

Generating 1.7B in free cash flow

Areas to Watch

CRTO4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Market CapQuality
$869.58M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Profit MarginProfitability
7.4%3/10

7.4% margin — thin

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-2.2%2/10

Revenue declined 2.2%

EPS GrowthGrowth
-26.7%2/10

Earnings declined 26.7%

WPP4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Operating MarginProfitability
2.2%3/10

Operating margin of 2.2%

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
4.232/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Return on EquityProfitability
-5.3%2/10

ROE of -5.3% — below average capital efficiency

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CRTO

The strongest argument for CRTO centers on P/E Ratio, Price/Book, Debt/Equity. PEG of 0.89 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : WPP

The strongest argument for WPP centers on Free Cash Flow.

Bear Case : CRTO

The primary concerns for CRTO are Market Cap, Profit Margin, Revenue Growth.

Bear Case : WPP

The primary concerns for WPP are Operating Margin, Piotroski F-Score, PEG Ratio. Debt-to-equity of 2.13 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

CRTO profiles as a value stock while WPP is a turnaround play — different risk/reward profiles.

WPP carries more volatility with a beta of 0.53 — expect wider price swings.

CRTO is growing revenue faster at -2.2% — sustainability is the question.

WPP generates stronger free cash flow (1.7B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

CRTO scores higher overall (59/100 vs 35/100). Both earn "Buy" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Criteo Sa

COMMUNICATION SERVICES · ADVERTISING AGENCIES · USA

Criteo SA, a technology company, provides open Internet monetization and marketing services in North and South America, Europe, the Middle East, Africa, and Asia-Pacific. The company is headquartered in Paris, France.

Visit Website →

WPP PLC ADR

COMMUNICATION SERVICES · ADVERTISING AGENCIES · USA

WPP plc, a creative transformation company, provides communications, expertise, trade and technology services in North America, the UK, Western Continental Europe, Asia Pacific, Latin America, Africa, the Middle East, and Central and Eastern Europe. The company is headquartered in London, the United Kingdom.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?