WallStSmart

Criteo Sa (CRTO)vsQMMM Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares (QMMM)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Criteo Sa generates 102128% more annual revenue ($1.92B vs $1.88M). CRTO leads profitability with a 6.0% profit margin vs -150.1%. CRTO earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 56/100 (C).

CRTO

Buy

56

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 2.0Profit: 5.0Value: 9.3Quality: 7.5
Piotroski: 6/9Altman Z: 2.42

QMMM

Avoid

14

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 2.7Profit: 2.0Value: 5.0Quality: 8.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 4.39
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

CRTOUndervalued (+46.8%)

Margin of Safety

+46.8%

Fair Value

$34.76

Current Price

$19.00

$15.76 discount

UndervaluedFair: $34.76Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for QMMM.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CRTO4 strengths · Avg: 9.3/10
P/E RatioValuation
10.0x10/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
0.8x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Debt/EquityHealth
0.139/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

PEG RatioValuation
0.898/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

QMMM2 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Debt/EquityHealth
0.0210/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
4.3910/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

Areas to Watch

CRTO4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
Market CapQuality
$1.07B3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Profit MarginProfitability
6.0%3/10

6.0% margin — thin

Operating MarginProfitability
3.8%3/10

Operating margin of 3.8%

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-5.9%2/10

Revenue declined 5.9%

QMMM4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
0.0%4/10

0.0% earnings growth

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Price/BookValuation
519.1x2/10

Trading at 519.1x book value

Return on EquityProfitability
-314.8%2/10

ROE of -314.8% — below average capital efficiency

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CRTO

The strongest argument for CRTO centers on P/E Ratio, Price/Book, Debt/Equity. PEG of 0.89 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : QMMM

The strongest argument for QMMM centers on Debt/Equity, Altman Z-Score.

Bear Case : CRTO

The primary concerns for CRTO are Market Cap, Profit Margin, Operating Margin.

Bear Case : QMMM

The primary concerns for QMMM are EPS Growth, Piotroski F-Score, Price/Book.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

CRTO profiles as a value stock while QMMM is a turnaround play — different risk/reward profiles.

QMMM carries more volatility with a beta of 14.89 — expect wider price swings.

CRTO is growing revenue faster at -5.9% — sustainability is the question.

QMMM generates stronger free cash flow (-51,742), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

CRTO scores higher overall (56/100 vs 14/100). Both earn "Buy" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Criteo Sa

COMMUNICATION SERVICES · ADVERTISING AGENCIES · USA

Criteo SA, a technology company, provides open Internet monetization and marketing services in North and South America, Europe, the Middle East, Africa, and Asia-Pacific. The company is headquartered in Paris, France.

Visit Website →

QMMM Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares

COMMUNICATION SERVICES · ADVERTISING AGENCIES · USA

QMMM Holdings Limited, provides digital media advertising and marketing production services primarily in Hong Kong.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?