WallStSmart

Omnicom Group Inc (OMC)vsWPP PLC ADR (WPP)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Omnicom Group Inc generates 46% more annual revenue ($19.82B vs $13.55B). OMC leads profitability with a 0.3% profit margin vs -1.6%. WPP appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 4.23. OMC earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 51/100 (C-).

OMC

Buy

51

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 6.0Profit: 5.0Value: 5.0Quality: 3.5
Piotroski: 1/9Altman Z: 0.76

WPP

Avoid

32

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 2.0Profit: 3.0Value: 5.7Quality: 2.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 0.73
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

OMCUndervalued (+23.8%)

Margin of Safety

+23.8%

Fair Value

$90.97

Current Price

$77.61

$13.36 discount

UndervaluedFair: $90.97Overvalued
WPPUndervalued (+75.7%)

Margin of Safety

+75.7%

Fair Value

$75.56

Current Price

$17.82

$57.74 discount

UndervaluedFair: $75.56Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

OMC2 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
69.2%10/10

Revenue surging 69.2% year-over-year

Price/BookValuation
2.0x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

WPP1 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
Free Cash FlowQuality
$1.71B8/10

Generating 1.7B in free cash flow

Areas to Watch

OMC4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
Return on EquityProfitability
2.0%3/10

ROE of 2.0% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
0.3%3/10

0.3% margin — thin

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
1/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
15.972/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

WPP4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Operating MarginProfitability
2.2%3/10

Operating margin of 2.2%

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
4.232/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Return on EquityProfitability
-5.3%2/10

ROE of -5.3% — below average capital efficiency

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : OMC

The strongest argument for OMC centers on Revenue Growth, Price/Book. Revenue growth of 69.2% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : WPP

The strongest argument for WPP centers on Free Cash Flow.

Bear Case : OMC

The primary concerns for OMC are Return on Equity, Profit Margin, Piotroski F-Score. Thin 0.3% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Bear Case : WPP

The primary concerns for WPP are Operating Margin, Piotroski F-Score, PEG Ratio. Debt-to-equity of 2.13 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

OMC profiles as a hypergrowth stock while WPP is a turnaround play — different risk/reward profiles.

OMC carries more volatility with a beta of 0.75 — expect wider price swings.

OMC is growing revenue faster at 69.2% — sustainability is the question.

WPP generates stronger free cash flow (1.7B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

OMC scores higher overall (51/100 vs 32/100) and 69.2% revenue growth. WPP offers better value entry with a 75.7% margin of safety. Both earn "Buy" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Omnicom Group Inc

COMMUNICATION SERVICES · ADVERTISING AGENCIES · USA

Omnicom Group Inc. is an American global media, marketing and corporate communications holding company, headquartered in New York City.

Visit Website →

WPP PLC ADR

COMMUNICATION SERVICES · ADVERTISING AGENCIES · USA

WPP plc, a creative transformation company, provides communications, expertise, trade and technology services in North America, the UK, Western Continental Europe, Asia Pacific, Latin America, Africa, the Middle East, and Central and Eastern Europe. The company is headquartered in London, the United Kingdom.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?