WallStSmart

Crescent Energy Co (CRGY)vsDiamondback Energy Inc (FANG)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Diamondback Energy Inc generates 299% more annual revenue ($14.29B vs $3.58B). FANG leads profitability with a 11.6% profit margin vs 3.7%. CRGY trades at a lower P/E of 24.2x. CRGY earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 50/100 (C-).

CRGY

Buy

50

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 6.0Profit: 4.5Value: 8.3Quality: 3.8
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 1.10

FANG

Hold

45

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 5.3Profit: 4.0Value: 4.7Quality: 3.3
Piotroski: 1/9Altman Z: 1.24
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

CRGYUndervalued (+58.3%)

Margin of Safety

+58.3%

Fair Value

$25.27

Current Price

$13.48

$11.79 discount

UndervaluedFair: $25.27Overvalued
FANGSignificantly Overvalued (-29.4%)

Margin of Safety

-29.4%

Fair Value

$130.64

Current Price

$196.02

$65.38 premium

UndervaluedFair: $130.64Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CRGY2 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Price/BookValuation
0.9x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

EPS GrowthGrowth
80.0%10/10

Earnings expanding 80.0% YoY

FANG3 strengths · Avg: 8.3/10
Market CapQuality
$55.59B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Price/BookValuation
1.5x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Free Cash FlowQuality
$1.40B8/10

Generating 1.4B in free cash flow

Areas to Watch

CRGY4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
Return on EquityProfitability
3.5%3/10

ROE of 3.5% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
3.7%3/10

3.7% margin — thin

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-1.2%2/10

Revenue declined 1.2%

FANG4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
34.4x4/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Return on EquityProfitability
3.7%3/10

ROE of 3.7% — below average capital efficiency

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
1/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
103.602/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CRGY

The strongest argument for CRGY centers on Price/Book, EPS Growth.

Bull Case : FANG

The strongest argument for FANG centers on Market Cap, Price/Book, Free Cash Flow.

Bear Case : CRGY

The primary concerns for CRGY are Return on Equity, Profit Margin, Piotroski F-Score. Thin 3.7% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Bear Case : FANG

The primary concerns for FANG are P/E Ratio, Return on Equity, Piotroski F-Score.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

CRGY profiles as a value stock while FANG is a declining play — different risk/reward profiles.

CRGY carries more volatility with a beta of 1.18 — expect wider price swings.

CRGY is growing revenue faster at -1.2% — sustainability is the question.

FANG generates stronger free cash flow (1.4B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

CRGY scores higher overall (50/100 vs 45/100). Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Crescent Energy Co

ENERGY · OIL & GAS E&P · USA

Crescent Energy Co (CRGY) is a leading oil and natural gas exploration and production company focused on developing domestic onshore resources, primarily within high-potential shale formations across the United States. Committed to sustainability and capital efficiency, Crescent emphasizes disciplined growth and seeks to enhance financial performance through innovative technologies that optimize production and recovery rates. As the energy sector evolves, the company is well-positioned to capitalize on emerging opportunities, solidifying its competitive edge in a dynamic market landscape.

Diamondback Energy Inc

ENERGY · OIL & GAS E&P · USA

Diamondback Energy is a company engaged in hydrocarbon exploration and headquartered in Midland, Texas.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?