WallStSmart

ConocoPhillips (COP)vsCrescent Energy Co (CRGY)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

ConocoPhillips generates 1584% more annual revenue ($60.28B vs $3.58B). COP leads profitability with a 13.3% profit margin vs 3.7%. COP trades at a lower P/E of 20.3x. CRGY earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 50/100 (C-).

COP

Hold

48

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 2.0Profit: 6.5Value: 4.7Quality: 5.0

CRGY

Buy

50

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 6.0Profit: 4.5Value: 8.3Quality: 3.8
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 1.10
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

COPSignificantly Overvalued (-157.1%)

Margin of Safety

-157.1%

Fair Value

$43.25

Current Price

$128.93

$85.68 premium

UndervaluedFair: $43.25Overvalued
CRGYUndervalued (+58.3%)

Margin of Safety

+58.3%

Fair Value

$25.27

Current Price

$13.48

$11.79 discount

UndervaluedFair: $25.27Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

COP3 strengths · Avg: 8.3/10
Market CapQuality
$157.60B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Price/BookValuation
2.4x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Free Cash FlowQuality
$1.29B8/10

Generating 1.3B in free cash flow

CRGY2 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Price/BookValuation
0.9x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

EPS GrowthGrowth
80.0%10/10

Earnings expanding 80.0% YoY

Areas to Watch

COP3 concerns · Avg: 2.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
4.222/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-6.8%2/10

Revenue declined 6.8%

EPS GrowthGrowth
-39.0%2/10

Earnings declined 39.0%

CRGY4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
Return on EquityProfitability
3.5%3/10

ROE of 3.5% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
3.7%3/10

3.7% margin — thin

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-1.2%2/10

Revenue declined 1.2%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : COP

The strongest argument for COP centers on Market Cap, Price/Book, Free Cash Flow.

Bull Case : CRGY

The strongest argument for CRGY centers on Price/Book, EPS Growth.

Bear Case : COP

The primary concerns for COP are PEG Ratio, Revenue Growth, EPS Growth.

Bear Case : CRGY

The primary concerns for CRGY are Return on Equity, Profit Margin, Piotroski F-Score. Thin 3.7% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

COP profiles as a declining stock while CRGY is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

CRGY carries more volatility with a beta of 1.18 — expect wider price swings.

CRGY is growing revenue faster at -1.2% — sustainability is the question.

COP generates stronger free cash flow (1.3B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

CRGY scores higher overall (50/100 vs 48/100). Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

ConocoPhillips

ENERGY · OIL & GAS E&P · USA

ConocoPhillips is an American multinational corporation engaged in hydrocarbon exploration. It is based in the Energy Corridor district of Houston, Texas.

Crescent Energy Co

ENERGY · OIL & GAS E&P · USA

Crescent Energy Co (CRGY) is a leading oil and natural gas exploration and production company focused on developing domestic onshore resources, primarily within high-potential shale formations across the United States. Committed to sustainability and capital efficiency, Crescent emphasizes disciplined growth and seeks to enhance financial performance through innovative technologies that optimize production and recovery rates. As the energy sector evolves, the company is well-positioned to capitalize on emerging opportunities, solidifying its competitive edge in a dynamic market landscape.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?