WallStSmart

Canadian Natural Resources Ltd (CNQ)vsVermilion Energy Inc. (VET)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Canadian Natural Resources Ltd generates 2178% more annual revenue ($38.76B vs $1.70B). CNQ leads profitability with a 27.9% profit margin vs -38.4%. CNQ appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 3.42. CNQ earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 67/100 (B-).

CNQ

Strong Buy

67

out of 100

Grade: B-

Growth: 3.3Profit: 8.5Value: 7.3Quality: 5.0

VET

Hold

43

out of 100

Grade: D

Growth: 3.3Profit: 4.5Value: 4.0Quality: 5.0
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

CNQUndervalued (+76.9%)

Margin of Safety

+76.9%

Fair Value

$175.97

Current Price

$49.02

$126.95 discount

UndervaluedFair: $175.97Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for VET.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CNQ5 strengths · Avg: 8.6/10
Market CapQuality
$102.25B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Return on EquityProfitability
25.8%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 26 in profit

Profit MarginProfitability
27.9%9/10

Keeps 28 of every $100 in revenue as profit

P/E RatioValuation
13.0x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Free Cash FlowQuality
$2.31B8/10

Generating 2.3B in free cash flow

VET1 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Price/BookValuation
1.3x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Areas to Watch

CNQ3 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
1.5%4/10

1.5% revenue growth

EPS GrowthGrowth
3.7%4/10

3.7% earnings growth

PEG RatioValuation
3.422/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

VET4 concerns · Avg: 2.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
3.582/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Return on EquityProfitability
-14.5%2/10

ROE of -14.5% — below average capital efficiency

EPS GrowthGrowth
-94.9%2/10

Earnings declined 94.9%

Free Cash FlowQuality
$-60.35M2/10

Negative free cash flow — burning cash

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CNQ

The strongest argument for CNQ centers on Market Cap, Return on Equity, Profit Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 27.9% and operating margin at 19.6%.

Bull Case : VET

The strongest argument for VET centers on Price/Book.

Bear Case : CNQ

The primary concerns for CNQ are Revenue Growth, EPS Growth, PEG Ratio.

Bear Case : VET

The primary concerns for VET are PEG Ratio, Return on Equity, EPS Growth.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

CNQ profiles as a value stock while VET is a turnaround play — different risk/reward profiles.

CNQ carries more volatility with a beta of 1.06 — expect wider price swings.

VET is growing revenue faster at 9.8% — sustainability is the question.

CNQ generates stronger free cash flow (2.3B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

CNQ scores higher overall (67/100 vs 43/100), backed by strong 27.9% margins. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Canadian Natural Resources Ltd

ENERGY · OIL & GAS E&P · USA

Canadian Natural Resources Limited acquires, explores, develops, produces, markets and sells crude oil, natural gas and natural gas liquids (NGL). The company is headquartered in Calgary, Canada.

Vermilion Energy Inc.

ENERGY · OIL & GAS E&P · USA

Vermilion Energy Inc. is engaged in the acquisition, exploration, development and production of oil and natural gas in North America, Europe and Australia. The company is headquartered in Calgary, Canada.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?