Canadian Natural Resources Ltd (CNQ)vsTexas Pacific Land Corporation (TPL)
CNQ
Canadian Natural Resources Ltd
$50.07
-0.55%
ENERGY · Cap: $103.22B
TPL
Texas Pacific Land Corporation
$369.10
+0.82%
ENERGY · Cap: $26.34B
Smart Verdict
WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison
Canadian Natural Resources Ltd generates 4878% more annual revenue ($44.68B vs $897.54M). TPL leads profitability with a 60.3% profit margin vs 26.3%. CNQ appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 3.42. CNQ earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 79/100 (B+).
CNQ
Strong Buy79
out of 100
Grade: B+
TPL
Strong Buy71
out of 100
Grade: B
Intrinsic Value Comparison
Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula
Margin of Safety
+47.9%
Fair Value
$96.11
Current Price
$50.07
$46.04 discount
Intrinsic value data unavailable for TPL.
Key Strengths & Concerns
Side-by-side fundamental analysis
Key Strengths
Strong operational efficiency at 43.1%
Revenue surging 69.5% year-over-year
Earnings expanding 83.8% YoY
Large-cap with strong market position
Every $100 of equity generates 25 in profit
Keeps 26 of every $100 in revenue as profit
Every $100 of equity generates 32 in profit
Keeps 60 of every $100 in revenue as profit
Strong operational efficiency at 78.2%
Revenue surging 31.2% year-over-year
Conservative balance sheet, low leverage
Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk
Areas to Watch
Expensive relative to growth rate
Trading at 16.4x book value
Weak financial health signals
Expensive relative to growth rate
Premium valuation, high expectations priced in
Comparative Analysis Report
WallStSmart ResearchBull Case : CNQ
The strongest argument for CNQ centers on Operating Margin, Revenue Growth, EPS Growth. Profitability is solid with margins at 26.3% and operating margin at 43.1%. Revenue growth of 69.5% demonstrates continued momentum.
Bull Case : TPL
The strongest argument for TPL centers on Return on Equity, Profit Margin, Operating Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 60.3% and operating margin at 78.2%. Revenue growth of 31.2% demonstrates continued momentum.
Bear Case : CNQ
The primary concerns for CNQ are PEG Ratio.
Bear Case : TPL
The primary concerns for TPL are Price/Book, Piotroski F-Score, PEG Ratio. A P/E of 48.8x leaves little room for execution misses.
Key Dynamics to Monitor
CNQ carries more volatility with a beta of 0.88 — expect wider price swings.
CNQ is growing revenue faster at 69.5% — sustainability is the question.
CNQ generates stronger free cash flow (4.4B), providing more financial flexibility.
Monitor OIL & GAS E&P industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.
Bottom Line
CNQ scores higher overall (79/100 vs 71/100), backed by strong 26.3% margins and 69.5% revenue growth. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Strong Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.
This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.
Canadian Natural Resources Ltd
ENERGY · OIL & GAS E&P · USA
Canadian Natural Resources Limited acquires, explores, develops, produces, markets and sells crude oil, natural gas and natural gas liquids (NGL). The company is headquartered in Calgary, Canada.
Texas Pacific Land Corporation
ENERGY · OIL & GAS E&P · USA
Texas Pacific Land Corporation is engaged in land and resource management, and water operations and services businesses. The company is headquartered in Dallas, Texas.
Compare with Other OIL & GAS E&P Stocks
Want to dig deeper into these stocks?