Diamondback Energy Inc (FANG)vsTexas Pacific Land Corporation (TPL)
FANG
Diamondback Energy Inc
$192.62
-5.09%
ENERGY · Cap: $56.94B
TPL
Texas Pacific Land Corporation
$389.79
-4.16%
ENERGY · Cap: $26.14B
Smart Verdict
WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison
Diamondback Energy Inc generates 1623% more annual revenue ($14.46B vs $839.02M). TPL leads profitability with a 60.0% profit margin vs 2.0%. TPL appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 7.33. TPL earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 65/100 (B-).
FANG
Hold41
out of 100
Grade: D
TPL
Strong Buy65
out of 100
Grade: B-
Intrinsic Value Comparison
Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula
Margin of Safety
+41.1%
Fair Value
$286.80
Current Price
$192.62
$94.18 discount
Intrinsic value data unavailable for TPL.
Key Strengths & Concerns
Side-by-side fundamental analysis
Key Strengths
Reasonable price relative to book value
Large-cap with strong market position
Every $100 of equity generates 32 in profit
Keeps 60 of every $100 in revenue as profit
Strong operational efficiency at 77.2%
Conservative balance sheet, low leverage
Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk
Revenue surging 20.8% year-over-year
Areas to Watch
4.2% revenue growth
ROE of 1.1% — below average capital efficiency
2.0% margin — thin
Weak financial health signals
Trading at 17.3x book value
Weak financial health signals
Expensive relative to growth rate
Premium valuation, high expectations priced in
Comparative Analysis Report
WallStSmart ResearchBull Case : FANG
The strongest argument for FANG centers on Price/Book, Market Cap.
Bull Case : TPL
The strongest argument for TPL centers on Return on Equity, Profit Margin, Operating Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 60.0% and operating margin at 77.2%. Revenue growth of 20.8% demonstrates continued momentum.
Bear Case : FANG
The primary concerns for FANG are Revenue Growth, Return on Equity, Profit Margin. A P/E of 208.7x leaves little room for execution misses. Thin 2.0% margins leave little buffer for downturns.
Bear Case : TPL
The primary concerns for TPL are Price/Book, Piotroski F-Score, PEG Ratio. A P/E of 52.0x leaves little room for execution misses.
Key Dynamics to Monitor
FANG profiles as a value stock while TPL is a growth play — different risk/reward profiles.
TPL carries more volatility with a beta of 0.61 — expect wider price swings.
TPL is growing revenue faster at 20.8% — sustainability is the question.
FANG generates stronger free cash flow (895M), providing more financial flexibility.
Bottom Line
TPL scores higher overall (65/100 vs 41/100), backed by strong 60.0% margins and 20.8% revenue growth. FANG offers better value entry with a 41.1% margin of safety. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.
This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.
Diamondback Energy Inc
ENERGY · OIL & GAS E&P · USA
Diamondback Energy is a company engaged in hydrocarbon exploration and headquartered in Midland, Texas.
Texas Pacific Land Corporation
ENERGY · OIL & GAS E&P · USA
Texas Pacific Land Corporation is engaged in land and resource management, and water operations and services businesses. The company is headquartered in Dallas, Texas.
Compare with Other OIL & GAS E&P Stocks
Want to dig deeper into these stocks?