WallStSmart

Canadian Natural Resources Ltd (CNQ)vsParker-Hannifin Corporation (PH)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Canadian Natural Resources Ltd generates 85% more annual revenue ($38.76B vs $20.99B). CNQ leads profitability with a 27.9% profit margin vs 16.6%. CNQ appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 3.42. CNQ earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 67/100 (B-).

CNQ

Strong Buy

67

out of 100

Grade: B-

Growth: 5.3Profit: 8.5Value: 7.3Quality: 5.0

PH

Buy

55

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 4.7Profit: 8.0Value: 3.7Quality: 5.8
Piotroski: 5/9Altman Z: 2.78
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

CNQUndervalued (+55.1%)

Margin of Safety

+55.1%

Fair Value

$90.53

Current Price

$44.53

$46.00 discount

UndervaluedFair: $90.53Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for PH.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CNQ6 strengths · Avg: 9.2/10
P/E RatioValuation
11.8x10/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

EPS GrowthGrowth
371.8%10/10

Earnings expanding 371.8% YoY

Market CapQuality
$92.88B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Return on EquityProfitability
25.8%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 26 in profit

Profit MarginProfitability
27.9%9/10

Keeps 28 of every $100 in revenue as profit

Price/BookValuation
2.8x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

PH3 strengths · Avg: 8.7/10
Market CapQuality
$111.82B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Return on EquityProfitability
24.8%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 25 in profit

Operating MarginProfitability
21.5%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 21.5%

Areas to Watch

CNQ2 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
1.5%4/10

1.5% revenue growth

PEG RatioValuation
3.422/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

PH3 concerns · Avg: 2.7/10
P/E RatioValuation
32.7x4/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

PEG RatioValuation
3.542/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

EPS GrowthGrowth
-4.2%2/10

Earnings declined 4.2%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CNQ

The strongest argument for CNQ centers on P/E Ratio, EPS Growth, Market Cap. Profitability is solid with margins at 27.9% and operating margin at 19.6%.

Bull Case : PH

The strongest argument for PH centers on Market Cap, Return on Equity, Operating Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 16.6% and operating margin at 21.5%. Revenue growth of 10.6% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : CNQ

The primary concerns for CNQ are Revenue Growth, PEG Ratio.

Bear Case : PH

The primary concerns for PH are P/E Ratio, PEG Ratio, EPS Growth.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

CNQ profiles as a value stock while PH is a mature play — different risk/reward profiles.

PH carries more volatility with a beta of 1.18 — expect wider price swings.

PH is growing revenue faster at 10.6% — sustainability is the question.

Monitor OIL & GAS E&P industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

CNQ scores higher overall (67/100 vs 55/100), backed by strong 27.9% margins. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Canadian Natural Resources Ltd

ENERGY · OIL & GAS E&P · USA

Canadian Natural Resources Limited acquires, explores, develops, produces, markets and sells crude oil, natural gas and natural gas liquids (NGL). The company is headquartered in Calgary, Canada.

Parker-Hannifin Corporation

INDUSTRIALS · SPECIALTY INDUSTRIAL MACHINERY · USA

Parker-Hannifin Corporation, originally Parker Appliance Company, usually referred to as just Parker, is an American corporation specializing in motion and control technologies. Its corporate headquarters are in Mayfield Heights, Ohio, in Greater Cleveland.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?