Canadian Natural Resources Ltd (CNQ)vsMcKesson Corporation (MCK)
CNQ
Canadian Natural Resources Ltd
$44.53
-0.47%
ENERGY · Cap: $92.88B
MCK
McKesson Corporation
$736.09
-2.47%
HEALTHCARE · Cap: $92.45B
Smart Verdict
WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison
McKesson Corporation generates 927% more annual revenue ($397.96B vs $38.76B). CNQ leads profitability with a 27.9% profit margin vs 1.1%. MCK appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.90. CNQ earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 67/100 (B-).
CNQ
Strong Buy67
out of 100
Grade: B-
MCK
Buy62
out of 100
Grade: C+
Intrinsic Value Comparison
Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula
Margin of Safety
+55.1%
Fair Value
$90.53
Current Price
$44.53
$46.00 discount
Margin of Safety
+63.8%
Fair Value
$2633.47
Current Price
$736.09
$1897.38 discount
Key Strengths & Concerns
Side-by-side fundamental analysis
Key Strengths
Attractively priced relative to earnings
Earnings expanding 371.8% YoY
Large-cap with strong market position
Every $100 of equity generates 26 in profit
Keeps 28 of every $100 in revenue as profit
Reasonable price relative to book value
Conservative balance sheet, low leverage
Large-cap with strong market position
Growing faster than its price suggests
Earnings expanding 38.0% YoY
Generating 3.4B in free cash flow
Areas to Watch
1.5% revenue growth
Expensive relative to growth rate
ROE of 0.0% — below average capital efficiency
1.1% margin — thin
Operating margin of 1.6%
Comparative Analysis Report
WallStSmart ResearchBull Case : CNQ
The strongest argument for CNQ centers on P/E Ratio, EPS Growth, Market Cap. Profitability is solid with margins at 27.9% and operating margin at 19.6%.
Bull Case : MCK
The strongest argument for MCK centers on Debt/Equity, Market Cap, PEG Ratio. Revenue growth of 11.4% demonstrates continued momentum. PEG of 0.90 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.
Bear Case : CNQ
The primary concerns for CNQ are Revenue Growth, PEG Ratio.
Bear Case : MCK
The primary concerns for MCK are Return on Equity, Profit Margin, Operating Margin. Thin 1.1% margins leave little buffer for downturns.
Key Dynamics to Monitor
CNQ carries more volatility with a beta of 0.91 — expect wider price swings.
MCK is growing revenue faster at 11.4% — sustainability is the question.
Monitor OIL & GAS E&P industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.
Bottom Line
CNQ scores higher overall (67/100 vs 62/100), backed by strong 27.9% margins. MCK offers better value entry with a 63.8% margin of safety. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.
This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.
Canadian Natural Resources Ltd
ENERGY · OIL & GAS E&P · USA
Canadian Natural Resources Limited acquires, explores, develops, produces, markets and sells crude oil, natural gas and natural gas liquids (NGL). The company is headquartered in Calgary, Canada.
McKesson Corporation
HEALTHCARE · MEDICAL DISTRIBUTION · USA
McKesson Corporation is an American company distributing pharmaceuticals and providing health information technology, medical supplies, and care management tools.
Visit Website →Compare with Other OIL & GAS E&P Stocks
Want to dig deeper into these stocks?