Canadian Natural Resources Ltd (CNQ)vsGran Tierra Energy Inc (GTE)
CNQ
Canadian Natural Resources Ltd
$45.70
-2.80%
ENERGY · Cap: $98.47B
GTE
Gran Tierra Energy Inc
$7.62
-7.41%
ENERGY · Cap: $269.44M
Smart Verdict
WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison
Canadian Natural Resources Ltd generates 6332% more annual revenue ($38.63B vs $600.60M). CNQ leads profitability with a 25.1% profit margin vs -48.8%. GTE appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.23. CNQ earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 58/100 (C).
CNQ
Buy58
out of 100
Grade: C
GTE
Hold40
out of 100
Grade: D
Intrinsic Value Comparison
Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula
Margin of Safety
+45.4%
Fair Value
$83.74
Current Price
$45.70
$38.04 discount
Intrinsic value data unavailable for GTE.
Key Strengths & Concerns
Side-by-side fundamental analysis
Key Strengths
Attractively priced relative to earnings
Every $100 of equity generates 30 in profit
Large-cap with strong market position
Keeps 25 of every $100 in revenue as profit
Reasonable price relative to book value
Strong operational efficiency at 21.8%
Growing faster than its price suggests
Reasonable price relative to book value
Areas to Watch
Expensive relative to growth rate
Revenue declined 1.2%
Earnings declined 45.3%
2.3% revenue growth
Smaller company, higher risk/reward
Weak financial health signals
ROE of -269.0% — below average capital efficiency
Comparative Analysis Report
WallStSmart ResearchBull Case : CNQ
The strongest argument for CNQ centers on P/E Ratio, Return on Equity, Market Cap. Profitability is solid with margins at 25.1% and operating margin at 21.8%.
Bull Case : GTE
The strongest argument for GTE centers on PEG Ratio, Price/Book. PEG of 0.23 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.
Bear Case : CNQ
The primary concerns for CNQ are PEG Ratio, Revenue Growth, EPS Growth.
Bear Case : GTE
The primary concerns for GTE are Revenue Growth, Market Cap, Piotroski F-Score. Debt-to-equity of 5.76 is elevated, increasing financial risk.
Key Dynamics to Monitor
CNQ profiles as a declining stock while GTE is a turnaround play — different risk/reward profiles.
CNQ carries more volatility with a beta of 0.91 — expect wider price swings.
GTE is growing revenue faster at 2.3% — sustainability is the question.
CNQ generates stronger free cash flow (856M), providing more financial flexibility.
Bottom Line
CNQ scores higher overall (58/100 vs 40/100), backed by strong 25.1% margins. Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.
This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.
Canadian Natural Resources Ltd
ENERGY · OIL & GAS E&P · USA
Canadian Natural Resources Limited acquires, explores, develops, produces, markets and sells crude oil, natural gas and natural gas liquids (NGL). The company is headquartered in Calgary, Canada.
Gran Tierra Energy Inc
ENERGY · OIL & GAS E&P · USA
Gran Tierra Energy Inc., is dedicated to the exploration and production of oil and gas properties in Colombia and Ecuador. The company is headquartered in Calgary, Canada.
Visit Website →Compare with Other OIL & GAS E&P Stocks
Want to dig deeper into these stocks?