WallStSmart

Canadian Natural Resources Ltd (CNQ)vsDuke Energy Corporation (DUK)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Canadian Natural Resources Ltd generates 22% more annual revenue ($38.76B vs $31.79B). CNQ leads profitability with a 27.9% profit margin vs 15.6%. DUK appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 2.68. CNQ earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 67/100 (B-).

CNQ

Strong Buy

67

out of 100

Grade: B-

Growth: 5.3Profit: 8.5Value: 6.7Quality: 5.0

DUK

Buy

59

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 4.0Profit: 7.0Value: 3.3Quality: 3.0
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 0.52
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

CNQUndervalued (+55.4%)

Margin of Safety

+55.4%

Fair Value

$91.17

Current Price

$47.70

$43.47 discount

UndervaluedFair: $91.17Overvalued
DUKSignificantly Overvalued (-64.7%)

Margin of Safety

-64.7%

Fair Value

$78.65

Current Price

$129.55

$50.90 premium

UndervaluedFair: $78.65Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CNQ6 strengths · Avg: 8.8/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
371.8%10/10

Earnings expanding 371.8% YoY

Market CapQuality
$99.52B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Return on EquityProfitability
25.8%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 26 in profit

Profit MarginProfitability
27.9%9/10

Keeps 28 of every $100 in revenue as profit

P/E RatioValuation
12.7x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Free Cash FlowQuality
$2.31B8/10

Generating 2.3B in free cash flow

DUK3 strengths · Avg: 8.3/10
Market CapQuality
$100.82B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Price/BookValuation
2.0x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Operating MarginProfitability
28.1%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 28.1%

Areas to Watch

CNQ2 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
1.5%4/10

1.5% revenue growth

PEG RatioValuation
3.422/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

DUK4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Debt/EquityHealth
1.753/10

Elevated debt levels

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
2.682/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

EPS GrowthGrowth
-2.2%2/10

Earnings declined 2.2%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CNQ

The strongest argument for CNQ centers on EPS Growth, Market Cap, Return on Equity. Profitability is solid with margins at 27.9% and operating margin at 19.6%.

Bull Case : DUK

The strongest argument for DUK centers on Market Cap, Price/Book, Operating Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 15.6% and operating margin at 28.1%.

Bear Case : CNQ

The primary concerns for CNQ are Revenue Growth, PEG Ratio.

Bear Case : DUK

The primary concerns for DUK are Debt/Equity, Piotroski F-Score, PEG Ratio. Debt-to-equity of 1.75 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

CNQ profiles as a value stock while DUK is a mature play — different risk/reward profiles.

CNQ carries more volatility with a beta of 0.93 — expect wider price swings.

DUK is growing revenue faster at 8.0% — sustainability is the question.

CNQ generates stronger free cash flow (2.3B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

CNQ scores higher overall (67/100 vs 59/100), backed by strong 27.9% margins. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Canadian Natural Resources Ltd

ENERGY · OIL & GAS E&P · USA

Canadian Natural Resources Limited acquires, explores, develops, produces, markets and sells crude oil, natural gas and natural gas liquids (NGL). The company is headquartered in Calgary, Canada.

Duke Energy Corporation

UTILITIES · UTILITIES - REGULATED ELECTRIC · USA

Duke Energy Corporation is an American electric power and natural gas holding company headquartered in Charlotte, North Carolina.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?