Canadian Natural Resources Ltd (CNQ)vsCoterra Energy Inc (CTRA)
CNQ
Canadian Natural Resources Ltd
$49.02
+1.32%
ENERGY · Cap: $102.25B
CTRA
Coterra Energy Inc
$35.18
+0.46%
ENERGY · Cap: $26.59B
Smart Verdict
WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison
Canadian Natural Resources Ltd generates 454% more annual revenue ($38.76B vs $6.99B). CNQ leads profitability with a 27.9% profit margin vs 24.6%. CNQ appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 3.42. CTRA earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 75/100 (B).
CNQ
Strong Buy67
out of 100
Grade: B-
CTRA
Strong Buy75
out of 100
Grade: B
Intrinsic Value Comparison
Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula
Margin of Safety
+76.9%
Fair Value
$175.97
Current Price
$49.02
$126.95 discount
Margin of Safety
+64.5%
Fair Value
$89.06
Current Price
$35.18
$53.88 discount
Key Strengths & Concerns
Side-by-side fundamental analysis
Key Strengths
Large-cap with strong market position
Every $100 of equity generates 26 in profit
Keeps 28 of every $100 in revenue as profit
Attractively priced relative to earnings
Generating 2.3B in free cash flow
Strong operational efficiency at 33.3%
Keeps 25 of every $100 in revenue as profit
Attractively priced relative to earnings
Reasonable price relative to book value
Revenue surging 23.4% year-over-year
Earnings expanding 20.6% YoY
Areas to Watch
1.5% revenue growth
3.7% earnings growth
Expensive relative to growth rate
Grey zone — moderate risk
Expensive relative to growth rate
Comparative Analysis Report
WallStSmart ResearchBull Case : CNQ
The strongest argument for CNQ centers on Market Cap, Return on Equity, Profit Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 27.9% and operating margin at 19.6%.
Bull Case : CTRA
The strongest argument for CTRA centers on Operating Margin, Profit Margin, P/E Ratio. Profitability is solid with margins at 24.6% and operating margin at 33.3%. Revenue growth of 23.4% demonstrates continued momentum.
Bear Case : CNQ
The primary concerns for CNQ are Revenue Growth, EPS Growth, PEG Ratio.
Bear Case : CTRA
The primary concerns for CTRA are Altman Z-Score, PEG Ratio.
Key Dynamics to Monitor
CNQ profiles as a value stock while CTRA is a growth play — different risk/reward profiles.
CNQ carries more volatility with a beta of 1.06 — expect wider price swings.
CTRA is growing revenue faster at 23.4% — sustainability is the question.
CNQ generates stronger free cash flow (2.3B), providing more financial flexibility.
Bottom Line
CTRA scores higher overall (75/100 vs 67/100), backed by strong 24.6% margins and 23.4% revenue growth. CNQ offers better value entry with a 76.9% margin of safety. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Strong Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.
This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.
Canadian Natural Resources Ltd
ENERGY · OIL & GAS E&P · USA
Canadian Natural Resources Limited acquires, explores, develops, produces, markets and sells crude oil, natural gas and natural gas liquids (NGL). The company is headquartered in Calgary, Canada.
Coterra Energy Inc
ENERGY · OIL & GAS E&P · USA
Coterra Energy Inc., an independent oil and gas company, explores, exploits, develops, produces and markets oil and gas properties in the United States. The company is headquartered in Houston, Texas.
Compare with Other OIL & GAS E&P Stocks
Want to dig deeper into these stocks?