WallStSmart

CNFinance Holdings Ltd (CNF)vsUWM Holdings Corp (UWMC)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

UWM Holdings Corp generates -998% more annual revenue ($3.61B vs $-401.75M). UWMC leads profitability with a 1.8% profit margin vs 0.0%. UWMC earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 66/100 (B-).

CNF

Hold

42

out of 100

Grade: D

Growth: 2.0Profit: 4.5Value: 5.0Quality: 4.0
Piotroski: 5/9Altman Z: 0.52

UWMC

Strong Buy

66

out of 100

Grade: B-

Growth: 8.7Profit: 7.5Value: 6.7Quality: 3.8
Piotroski: 5/9Altman Z: 0.34

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CNF2 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Price/BookValuation
0.0x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Operating MarginProfitability
113.5%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 113.5%

UWMC5 strengths · Avg: 9.4/10
P/E RatioValuation
7.9x10/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Operating MarginProfitability
40.7%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 40.7%

EPS GrowthGrowth
277.8%10/10

Earnings expanding 277.8% YoY

Return on EquityProfitability
28.9%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 29 in profit

Revenue GrowthGrowth
24.4%8/10

Revenue surging 24.4% year-over-year

Areas to Watch

CNF4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Market CapQuality
$53.10M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Profit MarginProfitability
0.0%3/10

0.0% margin — thin

Return on EquityProfitability
-1.6%2/10

ROE of -1.6% — below average capital efficiency

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-75.1%2/10

Revenue declined 75.1%

UWMC4 concerns · Avg: 2.0/10
Profit MarginProfitability
1.8%3/10

1.8% margin — thin

Free Cash FlowQuality
$-2.25B2/10

Negative free cash flow — burning cash

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
0.342/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Debt/EquityHealth
70.651/10

Elevated debt levels

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CNF

The strongest argument for CNF centers on Price/Book, Operating Margin.

Bull Case : UWMC

The strongest argument for UWMC centers on P/E Ratio, Operating Margin, EPS Growth. Revenue growth of 24.4% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : CNF

The primary concerns for CNF are Market Cap, Profit Margin, Return on Equity.

Bear Case : UWMC

The primary concerns for UWMC are Profit Margin, Free Cash Flow, Altman Z-Score. Debt-to-equity of 70.65 is elevated, increasing financial risk. Thin 1.8% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

CNF profiles as a value stock while UWMC is a growth play — different risk/reward profiles.

UWMC carries more volatility with a beta of 1.77 — expect wider price swings.

UWMC is growing revenue faster at 24.4% — sustainability is the question.

CNF generates stronger free cash flow (79M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

UWMC scores higher overall (66/100 vs 42/100) and 24.4% revenue growth. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

CNFinance Holdings Ltd

FINANCIAL SERVICES · MORTGAGE FINANCE · China

CNFinance Holdings Limited, offers home equity loan services in the People's Republic of China. The company is headquartered in Guangzhou, China.

Visit Website →

UWM Holdings Corp

FINANCIAL SERVICES · MORTGAGE FINANCE · USA

UWM Holdings Corporation is engaged in the residential mortgage loan business in the United States. The company is headquartered in Pontiac, Michigan.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?