WallStSmart

CNA Financial Corporation (CNA)vsW. R. Berkley Corp (WRB)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

CNA Financial Corporation generates 2% more annual revenue ($14.99B vs $14.71B). WRB leads profitability with a 12.1% profit margin vs 8.5%. CNA appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.92. CNA earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 72/100 (B).

CNA

Strong Buy

72

out of 100

Grade: B

Growth: 5.3Profit: 5.5Value: 10.0Quality: 5.0
Piotroski: 5/9Altman Z: 0.59

WRB

Buy

55

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 4.0Profit: 7.0Value: 4.7Quality: 4.8
Piotroski: 2/9
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

CNAUndervalued (+78.0%)

Margin of Safety

+78.0%

Fair Value

$220.90

Current Price

$45.54

$175.36 discount

UndervaluedFair: $220.90Overvalued
WRBSignificantly Overvalued (-136.4%)

Margin of Safety

-136.4%

Fair Value

$30.26

Current Price

$64.49

$34.23 premium

UndervaluedFair: $30.26Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CNA4 strengths · Avg: 9.3/10
P/E RatioValuation
9.7x10/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
1.1x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Debt/EquityHealth
0.269/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

PEG RatioValuation
0.928/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

WRB2 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
14.5x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
2.5x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Areas to Watch

CNA2 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
3.8%4/10

3.8% revenue growth

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
0.592/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

WRB4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
1.5%4/10

1.5% revenue growth

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
10.112/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

EPS GrowthGrowth
-21.8%2/10

Earnings declined 21.8%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CNA

The strongest argument for CNA centers on P/E Ratio, Price/Book, Debt/Equity. PEG of 0.92 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : WRB

The strongest argument for WRB centers on P/E Ratio, Price/Book.

Bear Case : CNA

The primary concerns for CNA are Revenue Growth, Altman Z-Score.

Bear Case : WRB

The primary concerns for WRB are Revenue Growth, Piotroski F-Score, PEG Ratio.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

CNA carries more volatility with a beta of 0.35 — expect wider price swings.

CNA is growing revenue faster at 3.8% — sustainability is the question.

WRB generates stronger free cash flow (896M), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor INSURANCE - PROPERTY & CASUALTY industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

CNA scores higher overall (72/100 vs 55/100). Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

CNA Financial Corporation

FINANCIAL SERVICES · INSURANCE - PROPERTY & CASUALTY · USA

CNA Financial Corporation offers commercial property and casualty insurance products primarily in the United States.

Visit Website →

W. R. Berkley Corp

FINANCIAL SERVICES · INSURANCE - PROPERTY & CASUALTY · USA

W. R. Berkley Corporation is a commercial lines property & casualty insurance holding company organized in Delaware and based in Greenwich, Connecticut.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?