WallStSmart

Cincinnati Financial Corporation (CINF)vsUniversal Insurance Holdings Inc (UVE)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Cincinnati Financial Corporation generates 707% more annual revenue ($12.93B vs $1.60B). CINF leads profitability with a 21.3% profit margin vs 12.2%. UVE trades at a lower P/E of 5.6x. CINF earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 73/100 (B).

CINF

Strong Buy

73

out of 100

Grade: B

Growth: 8.7Profit: 7.0Value: 6.3Quality: 6.0
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 1.66

UVE

Strong Buy

66

out of 100

Grade: B-

Growth: 6.0Profit: 7.5Value: 6.7Quality: 5.5
Piotroski: 6/9Altman Z: 0.99

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CINF5 strengths · Avg: 9.4/10
P/E RatioValuation
9.7x10/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

EPS GrowthGrowth
67.3%10/10

Earnings expanding 67.3% YoY

Debt/EquityHealth
0.0610/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Profit MarginProfitability
21.3%9/10

Keeps 21 of every $100 in revenue as profit

Price/BookValuation
1.6x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

UVE5 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
5.6x10/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Return on EquityProfitability
33.5%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 33 in profit

Debt/EquityHealth
0.179/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Price/BookValuation
1.9x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

EPS GrowthGrowth
30.6%8/10

Earnings expanding 30.6% YoY

Areas to Watch

CINF2 concerns · Avg: 4.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
2.194/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.664/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

UVE3 concerns · Avg: 2.3/10
Market CapQuality
$1.06B3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-0.3%2/10

Revenue declined 0.3%

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
0.992/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CINF

The strongest argument for CINF centers on P/E Ratio, EPS Growth, Debt/Equity. Profitability is solid with margins at 21.3% and operating margin at 11.8%. Revenue growth of 11.6% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : UVE

The strongest argument for UVE centers on P/E Ratio, Return on Equity, Debt/Equity.

Bear Case : CINF

The primary concerns for CINF are PEG Ratio, Altman Z-Score.

Bear Case : UVE

The primary concerns for UVE are Market Cap, Revenue Growth, Altman Z-Score.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

CINF profiles as a mature stock while UVE is a declining play — different risk/reward profiles.

UVE carries more volatility with a beta of 0.75 — expect wider price swings.

CINF is growing revenue faster at 11.6% — sustainability is the question.

CINF generates stronger free cash flow (654M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

CINF scores higher overall (73/100 vs 66/100), backed by strong 21.3% margins and 11.6% revenue growth. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Strong Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Cincinnati Financial Corporation

FINANCIAL SERVICES · INSURANCE - PROPERTY & CASUALTY · USA

Cincinnati Financial Corporation offers property and casualty insurance, its main business, through The Cincinnati Insurance Company, The Cincinnati Indemnity Company and The Cincinnati Casualty Company.

Universal Insurance Holdings Inc

FINANCIAL SERVICES · INSURANCE - PROPERTY & CASUALTY · USA

Universal Insurance Holdings, Inc., is an integrated insurance holding company in the United States. The company is headquartered in Fort Lauderdale, Florida.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?