WallStSmart

Cheer Holding Inc. (CHR)vsWPP PLC ADR (WPP)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

WPP PLC ADR generates 9483% more annual revenue ($13.26B vs $138.37M). CHR leads profitability with a 18.7% profit margin vs -1.8%. CHR earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 46/100 (D+).

CHR

Hold

46

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 2.0Profit: 7.5Value: 5.0Quality: 8.5
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 9.35

WPP

Avoid

34

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 2.0Profit: 4.0Value: 5.7Quality: 2.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 0.73
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

Intrinsic value data unavailable for CHR.

WPPUndervalued (+67.4%)

Margin of Safety

+67.4%

Fair Value

$56.26

Current Price

$24.97

$31.29 discount

UndervaluedFair: $56.26Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CHR3 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Price/BookValuation
0.0x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Debt/EquityHealth
0.0110/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
9.3510/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

WPP0 strengths · Avg: 0/10

No standout strengths identified

Areas to Watch

CHR4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Market CapQuality
$2.99M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-14.7%2/10

Revenue declined 14.7%

EPS GrowthGrowth
-95.1%2/10

Earnings declined 95.1%

WPP4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Operating MarginProfitability
4.1%3/10

Operating margin of 4.1%

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
4.232/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-4.4%2/10

Revenue declined 4.4%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CHR

The strongest argument for CHR centers on Price/Book, Debt/Equity, Altman Z-Score. Profitability is solid with margins at 18.7% and operating margin at 17.3%.

Bull Case : WPP

WPP has a balanced fundamental profile.

Bear Case : CHR

The primary concerns for CHR are Market Cap, Piotroski F-Score, Revenue Growth.

Bear Case : WPP

The primary concerns for WPP are Operating Margin, Piotroski F-Score, PEG Ratio. Debt-to-equity of 2.76 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

CHR profiles as a declining stock while WPP is a turnaround play — different risk/reward profiles.

CHR carries more volatility with a beta of 0.87 — expect wider price swings.

WPP is growing revenue faster at -4.4% — sustainability is the question.

CHR generates stronger free cash flow (-15M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

CHR scores higher overall (46/100 vs 34/100), backed by strong 18.7% margins. WPP offers better value entry with a 67.4% margin of safety. Both earn "Hold" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Cheer Holding Inc.

COMMUNICATION SERVICES · ADVERTISING AGENCIES · USA

Cheer Holding, Inc., provides advertisement and content production services in the People's Republic of China. The company is headquartered in Beijing, the People's Republic of China.

WPP PLC ADR

COMMUNICATION SERVICES · ADVERTISING AGENCIES · USA

WPP plc, a creative transformation company, provides communications, expertise, trade and technology services in North America, the UK, Western Continental Europe, Asia Pacific, Latin America, Africa, the Middle East, and Central and Eastern Europe. The company is headquartered in London, the United Kingdom.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?