WallStSmart

Cheer Holding Inc. (CHR)vsOmnicom Group Inc (OMC)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Omnicom Group Inc generates 11505% more annual revenue ($17.27B vs $148.84M). CHR leads profitability with a 17.2% profit margin vs -0.3%. CHR earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 50/100 (D+).

CHR

Hold

50

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 2.7Profit: 6.5Value: 8.3Quality: 8.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 6.84

OMC

Hold

49

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 5.3Profit: 4.5Value: 4.0Quality: 3.5
Piotroski: 1/9Altman Z: 0.76
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

CHRUndervalued (+99.8%)

Margin of Safety

+99.8%

Fair Value

$788.80

Current Price

$0.90

$787.90 discount

UndervaluedFair: $788.80Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for OMC.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CHR5 strengths · Avg: 9.6/10
P/E RatioValuation
0.0x10/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
0.0x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Debt/EquityHealth
0.0310/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
6.8410/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

Operating MarginProfitability
23.1%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 23.1%

OMC3 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
Price/BookValuation
2.0x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Revenue GrowthGrowth
27.9%8/10

Revenue surging 27.9% year-over-year

Free Cash FlowQuality
$3.00B8/10

Generating 3.0B in free cash flow

Areas to Watch

CHR4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
2.2%4/10

2.2% revenue growth

Market CapQuality
$4.56M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Return on EquityProfitability
7.6%3/10

ROE of 7.6% — below average capital efficiency

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

OMC4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Return on EquityProfitability
0.5%3/10

ROE of 0.5% — below average capital efficiency

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
1/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
15.972/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

EPS GrowthGrowth
-10.3%2/10

Earnings declined 10.3%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CHR

The strongest argument for CHR centers on P/E Ratio, Price/Book, Debt/Equity. Profitability is solid with margins at 17.2% and operating margin at 23.1%.

Bull Case : OMC

The strongest argument for OMC centers on Price/Book, Revenue Growth, Free Cash Flow. Revenue growth of 27.9% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : CHR

The primary concerns for CHR are Revenue Growth, Market Cap, Return on Equity.

Bear Case : OMC

The primary concerns for OMC are Return on Equity, Piotroski F-Score, PEG Ratio.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

CHR profiles as a value stock while OMC is a growth play — different risk/reward profiles.

CHR carries more volatility with a beta of 1.06 — expect wider price swings.

OMC is growing revenue faster at 27.9% — sustainability is the question.

OMC generates stronger free cash flow (3.0B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

CHR scores higher overall (50/100 vs 49/100), backed by strong 17.2% margins. Both earn "Hold" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Cheer Holding Inc.

COMMUNICATION SERVICES · ADVERTISING AGENCIES · USA

Cheer Holding, Inc., provides advertisement and content production services in the People's Republic of China. The company is headquartered in Beijing, the People's Republic of China.

Omnicom Group Inc

COMMUNICATION SERVICES · ADVERTISING AGENCIES · USA

Omnicom Group Inc. is an American global media, marketing and corporate communications holding company, headquartered in New York City.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?