WallStSmart

Biglari Holdings Inc (BH-A)vsYum! Brands Inc (YUM)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Yum! Brands Inc generates 2050% more annual revenue ($8.72B vs $405.61M). YUM leads profitability with a 25.4% profit margin vs -7.3%. YUM earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 63/100 (C+).

BH-A

Avoid

32

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 4.0Profit: 3.5Value: 5.0Quality: 6.0
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 1.88

YUM

Buy

63

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 7.3Profit: 8.5Value: 4.0Quality: 4.5
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 0.92
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

Intrinsic value data unavailable for BH-A.

YUMSignificantly Overvalued (-78.8%)

Margin of Safety

-78.8%

Fair Value

$88.94

Current Price

$153.86

$64.92 premium

UndervaluedFair: $88.94Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

BH-A1 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
Price/BookValuation
2.3x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

YUM4 strengths · Avg: 9.8/10
Operating MarginProfitability
32.8%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 32.8%

EPS GrowthGrowth
131.6%10/10

Earnings expanding 131.6% YoY

Debt/EquityHealth
-1.7310/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Profit MarginProfitability
25.4%9/10

Keeps 25 of every $100 in revenue as profit

Areas to Watch

BH-A4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.884/10

Grey zone — moderate risk

Market CapQuality
$1.21B3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Return on EquityProfitability
-3.6%2/10

ROE of -3.6% — below average capital efficiency

YUM4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
2.124/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Return on EquityProfitability
0.0%3/10

ROE of 0.0% — below average capital efficiency

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
0.922/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : BH-A

The strongest argument for BH-A centers on Price/Book.

Bull Case : YUM

The strongest argument for YUM centers on Operating Margin, EPS Growth, Debt/Equity. Profitability is solid with margins at 25.4% and operating margin at 32.8%. Revenue growth of 12.2% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : BH-A

The primary concerns for BH-A are Altman Z-Score, Market Cap, Piotroski F-Score.

Bear Case : YUM

The primary concerns for YUM are PEG Ratio, Return on Equity, Piotroski F-Score.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

BH-A profiles as a turnaround stock while YUM is a mature play — different risk/reward profiles.

YUM carries more volatility with a beta of 0.55 — expect wider price swings.

YUM is growing revenue faster at 12.2% — sustainability is the question.

YUM generates stronger free cash flow (407M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

YUM scores higher overall (63/100 vs 32/100), backed by strong 25.4% margins and 12.2% revenue growth. Both earn "Buy" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Biglari Holdings Inc

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · RESTAURANTS · USA

Biglari Holdings Inc., primarily operates and franchises restaurants in the United States. The company is headquartered in San Antonio, Texas.

Yum! Brands Inc

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · RESTAURANTS · USA

Yum! Brands, Inc. is an American fast food corporation listed on the Fortune 1000. Yum! operates the brands KFC, Pizza Hut, Taco Bell, The Habit Burger Grill, and WingStreet worldwide, except in China, where the brands are operated by a separate company, Yum China.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?