WallStSmart

Biglari Holdings Inc (BH-A)vsRestaurant Brands International Inc (QSR)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Restaurant Brands International Inc generates 2291% more annual revenue ($9.70B vs $405.61M). QSR leads profitability with a 13.1% profit margin vs -7.3%. QSR earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 68/100 (B-).

BH-A

Avoid

32

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 4.0Profit: 3.5Value: 5.0Quality: 6.0
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 1.88

QSR

Strong Buy

68

out of 100

Grade: B-

Growth: 7.3Profit: 8.0Value: 6.7Quality: 3.5
Piotroski: 5/9Altman Z: 0.90
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

Intrinsic value data unavailable for BH-A.

QSRUndervalued (+25.1%)

Margin of Safety

+25.1%

Fair Value

$94.46

Current Price

$78.26

$16.20 discount

UndervaluedFair: $94.46Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

BH-A1 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
Price/BookValuation
2.3x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

QSR3 strengths · Avg: 9.3/10
Return on EquityProfitability
33.1%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 33 in profit

EPS GrowthGrowth
151.2%10/10

Earnings expanding 151.2% YoY

Operating MarginProfitability
27.7%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 27.7%

Areas to Watch

BH-A4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.884/10

Grey zone — moderate risk

Market CapQuality
$1.21B3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Return on EquityProfitability
-3.6%2/10

ROE of -3.6% — below average capital efficiency

QSR3 concerns · Avg: 2.3/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
4.6%4/10

4.6% revenue growth

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
0.902/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Debt/EquityHealth
4.071/10

Elevated debt levels

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : BH-A

The strongest argument for BH-A centers on Price/Book.

Bull Case : QSR

The strongest argument for QSR centers on Return on Equity, EPS Growth, Operating Margin. PEG of 1.24 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : BH-A

The primary concerns for BH-A are Altman Z-Score, Market Cap, Piotroski F-Score.

Bear Case : QSR

The primary concerns for QSR are Revenue Growth, Altman Z-Score, Debt/Equity. Debt-to-equity of 4.07 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

BH-A profiles as a turnaround stock while QSR is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

QSR carries more volatility with a beta of 0.53 — expect wider price swings.

BH-A is growing revenue faster at 7.9% — sustainability is the question.

QSR generates stronger free cash flow (479M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

QSR scores higher overall (68/100 vs 32/100). Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Biglari Holdings Inc

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · RESTAURANTS · USA

Biglari Holdings Inc., primarily operates and franchises restaurants in the United States. The company is headquartered in San Antonio, Texas.

Restaurant Brands International Inc

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · RESTAURANTS · USA

Restaurant Brands International Inc. owns, operates and franchises quick-service restaurants under the Tim Hortons (TH), Burger King (BK) and Popeyes (PLK) brands. The company is headquartered in Toronto, Canada.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?