Grupo Supervielle SA (SUPV)vsWells Fargo & Company (WFC)
SUPV
Grupo Supervielle SA
$8.48
-1.40%
FINANCIAL SERVICES · Cap: $812.77M
WFC
Wells Fargo & Company
$87.54
+0.31%
FINANCIAL SERVICES · Cap: $267.29B
Smart Verdict
WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison
Grupo Supervielle SA generates 781% more annual revenue ($731.48B vs $83.03B). WFC leads profitability with a 27.2% profit margin vs -10.4%. SUPV appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.29. WFC earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 76/100 (B+).
SUPV
Hold41
out of 100
Grade: D
WFC
Strong Buy76
out of 100
Grade: B+
Key Strengths & Concerns
Side-by-side fundamental analysis
Key Strengths
Growing faster than its price suggests
Reasonable price relative to book value
Mega-cap, among the largest globally
Strong operational efficiency at 37.4%
Keeps 27 of every $100 in revenue as profit
Attractively priced relative to earnings
Reasonable price relative to book value
Earnings expanding 25.0% YoY
Areas to Watch
1.1% revenue growth
Smaller company, higher risk/reward
Elevated debt levels
Weak financial health signals
Expensive relative to growth rate
Distress zone — elevated risk
Elevated debt levels
Comparative Analysis Report
WallStSmart ResearchBull Case : SUPV
The strongest argument for SUPV centers on PEG Ratio, Price/Book. PEG of 0.29 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.
Bull Case : WFC
The strongest argument for WFC centers on Market Cap, Operating Margin, Profit Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 27.2% and operating margin at 37.4%.
Bear Case : SUPV
The primary concerns for SUPV are Revenue Growth, Market Cap, Debt/Equity.
Bear Case : WFC
The primary concerns for WFC are PEG Ratio, Altman Z-Score, Debt/Equity. Debt-to-equity of 2.55 is elevated, increasing financial risk.
Key Dynamics to Monitor
SUPV profiles as a turnaround stock while WFC is a mature play — different risk/reward profiles.
WFC carries more volatility with a beta of 0.92 — expect wider price swings.
WFC is growing revenue faster at 9.5% — sustainability is the question.
WFC generates stronger free cash flow (9.1B), providing more financial flexibility.
Bottom Line
WFC scores higher overall (76/100 vs 41/100), backed by strong 27.2% margins. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.
This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.
Grupo Supervielle SA
FINANCIAL SERVICES · BANKS - REGIONAL · USA
Grupo Supervielle SA, a financial services holding company, offers various banking products and services in Argentina. The company is headquartered in Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Wells Fargo & Company
FINANCIAL SERVICES · BANKS - DIVERSIFIED · USA
Wells Fargo & Company is an American multinational financial services company with corporate headquarters in San Francisco, California, operational headquarters in Manhattan, and managerial offices throughout the United States and overseas.
Compare with Other BANKS - REGIONAL Stocks
Want to dig deeper into these stocks?