Grupo Supervielle SA (SUPV)vsWells Fargo & Company (WFC)
SUPV
Grupo Supervielle SA
$8.23
-3.52%
FINANCIAL SERVICES · Cap: $834.51M
WFC
Wells Fargo & Company
$82.23
+0.88%
FINANCIAL SERVICES · Cap: $249.77B
Smart Verdict
WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison
Grupo Supervielle SA generates 798% more annual revenue ($728.99B vs $81.14B). WFC leads profitability with a 26.7% profit margin vs -6.7%. SUPV appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.29. WFC earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 74/100 (B).
SUPV
Hold39
out of 100
Grade: F
WFC
Strong Buy74
out of 100
Grade: B
Key Strengths & Concerns
Side-by-side fundamental analysis
Key Strengths
Growing faster than its price suggests
Reasonable price relative to book value
Generating 56.0B in free cash flow
Mega-cap, among the largest globally
Keeps 27 of every $100 in revenue as profit
Attractively priced relative to earnings
Reasonable price relative to book value
Strong operational efficiency at 29.4%
Generating 4.1B in free cash flow
Areas to Watch
Smaller company, higher risk/reward
ROE of -4.7% — below average capital efficiency
Revenue declined 29.8%
Earnings declined 42.3%
Distress zone — elevated risk
Comparative Analysis Report
WallStSmart ResearchBull Case : SUPV
The strongest argument for SUPV centers on PEG Ratio, Price/Book, Free Cash Flow. PEG of 0.29 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.
Bull Case : WFC
The strongest argument for WFC centers on Market Cap, Profit Margin, P/E Ratio. Profitability is solid with margins at 26.7% and operating margin at 29.4%. PEG of 1.45 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.
Bear Case : SUPV
The primary concerns for SUPV are Market Cap, Return on Equity, Revenue Growth.
Bear Case : WFC
The primary concerns for WFC are Altman Z-Score.
Key Dynamics to Monitor
SUPV profiles as a turnaround stock while WFC is a mature play — different risk/reward profiles.
WFC carries more volatility with a beta of 1.06 — expect wider price swings.
WFC is growing revenue faster at 5.7% — sustainability is the question.
SUPV generates stronger free cash flow (56.0B), providing more financial flexibility.
Bottom Line
WFC scores higher overall (74/100 vs 39/100), backed by strong 26.7% margins. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.
This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.
Grupo Supervielle SA
FINANCIAL SERVICES · BANKS - REGIONAL · USA
Grupo Supervielle SA, a financial services holding company, offers various banking products and services in Argentina. The company is headquartered in Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Wells Fargo & Company
FINANCIAL SERVICES · BANKS - DIVERSIFIED · USA
Wells Fargo & Company is an American multinational financial services company with corporate headquarters in San Francisco, California, operational headquarters in Manhattan, and managerial offices throughout the United States and overseas.
Compare with Other BANKS - REGIONAL Stocks
Want to dig deeper into these stocks?