Steven Madden Ltd (SHOO)vsWolverine World Wide Inc (WWW)
SHOO
Steven Madden Ltd
$42.93
+3.30%
CONSUMER CYCLICAL · Cap: $3.18B
WWW
Wolverine World Wide Inc
$19.93
+3.32%
CONSUMER CYCLICAL · Cap: $1.61B
Smart Verdict
WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison
Steven Madden Ltd generates 40% more annual revenue ($2.74B vs $1.95B). WWW leads profitability with a 5.5% profit margin vs 5.2%. SHOO appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 2.17. SHOO earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 61/100 (C+).
SHOO
Buy61
out of 100
Grade: C+
WWW
Buy59
out of 100
Grade: C
Intrinsic Value Comparison
Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula
Margin of Safety
+58.9%
Fair Value
$93.83
Current Price
$42.93
$50.90 discount
Margin of Safety
+36.9%
Fair Value
$28.26
Current Price
$19.93
$8.33 discount
Key Strengths & Concerns
Side-by-side fundamental analysis
Key Strengths
Earnings expanding 75.4% YoY
Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk
19.1% revenue growth
Every $100 of equity generates 29 in profit
Attractively priced relative to earnings
Areas to Watch
Expensive relative to growth rate
5.2% margin — thin
Weak financial health signals
Expensive relative to growth rate
Smaller company, higher risk/reward
5.5% margin — thin
Elevated debt levels
Comparative Analysis Report
WallStSmart ResearchBull Case : SHOO
The strongest argument for SHOO centers on EPS Growth, Altman Z-Score, Revenue Growth. Revenue growth of 19.1% demonstrates continued momentum.
Bull Case : WWW
The strongest argument for WWW centers on Return on Equity, P/E Ratio.
Bear Case : SHOO
The primary concerns for SHOO are PEG Ratio, Profit Margin, Piotroski F-Score.
Bear Case : WWW
The primary concerns for WWW are PEG Ratio, Market Cap, Profit Margin. Debt-to-equity of 1.66 is elevated, increasing financial risk.
Key Dynamics to Monitor
SHOO profiles as a growth stock while WWW is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.
WWW carries more volatility with a beta of 1.73 — expect wider price swings.
SHOO is growing revenue faster at 19.1% — sustainability is the question.
SHOO generates stronger free cash flow (205M), providing more financial flexibility.
Bottom Line
SHOO scores higher overall (61/100 vs 59/100) and 19.1% revenue growth. WWW offers better value entry with a 36.9% margin of safety. Both earn "Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.
This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.
Steven Madden Ltd
CONSUMER CYCLICAL · FOOTWEAR & ACCESSORIES · USA
Steven Madden, Ltd. designs, supplies, markets and sells private label and brand name footwear for women, men and children in the United States and internationally. The company is headquartered in Long Island City, New York.
Wolverine World Wide Inc
CONSUMER CYCLICAL · FOOTWEAR & ACCESSORIES · USA
Wolverine World Wide, Inc. designs, manufactures, supplies, markets, licenses, and distributes footwear, apparel, and accessories in the United States, Europe, the Middle East, Africa, Asia Pacific, Canada, and Latin America. The company is headquartered in Rockford, Michigan.
Compare with Other FOOTWEAR & ACCESSORIES Stocks
Want to dig deeper into these stocks?