WallStSmart

Birkenstock Holding plc (BIRK)vsWolverine World Wide Inc (WWW)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Birkenstock Holding plc generates 14% more annual revenue ($2.18B vs $1.92B). BIRK leads profitability with a 16.3% profit margin vs 5.4%. BIRK appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.38. WWW earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 65/100 (C+).

BIRK

Buy

58

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 5.3Profit: 7.5Value: 5.7Quality: 7.5
Piotroski: 7/9Altman Z: 1.94

WWW

Buy

65

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 6.0Profit: 6.5Value: 7.3Quality: 6.5
Piotroski: 6/9Altman Z: 2.48
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

Intrinsic value data unavailable for BIRK.

WWWUndervalued (+36.9%)

Margin of Safety

+36.9%

Fair Value

$28.24

Current Price

$15.90

$12.34 discount

UndervaluedFair: $28.24Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

BIRK2 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
Price/BookValuation
2.3x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Operating MarginProfitability
26.9%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 26.9%

WWW3 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
64.1%10/10

Earnings expanding 64.1% YoY

Return on EquityProfitability
29.2%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 29 in profit

P/E RatioValuation
14.3x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Areas to Watch

BIRK2 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.944/10

Grey zone — moderate risk

EPS GrowthGrowth
-20.4%2/10

Earnings declined 20.4%

WWW4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
PEG RatioValuation
2.364/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Market CapQuality
$1.44B3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Profit MarginProfitability
5.4%3/10

5.4% margin — thin

Debt/EquityHealth
1.893/10

Elevated debt levels

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : BIRK

The strongest argument for BIRK centers on Price/Book, Operating Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 16.3% and operating margin at 26.9%. PEG of 1.38 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : WWW

The strongest argument for WWW centers on EPS Growth, Return on Equity, P/E Ratio. Revenue growth of 11.0% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : BIRK

The primary concerns for BIRK are Altman Z-Score, EPS Growth.

Bear Case : WWW

The primary concerns for WWW are PEG Ratio, Market Cap, Profit Margin. Debt-to-equity of 1.89 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

BIRK profiles as a mature stock while WWW is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

WWW carries more volatility with a beta of 1.76 — expect wider price swings.

WWW is growing revenue faster at 11.0% — sustainability is the question.

BIRK generates stronger free cash flow (2M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

WWW scores higher overall (65/100 vs 58/100) and 11.0% revenue growth. Both earn "Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Birkenstock Holding plc

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · FOOTWEAR & ACCESSORIES · USA

Birkenstock Holding plc manufactures and sells footwear products. The company is headquartered in London, the United Kingdom.

Wolverine World Wide Inc

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · FOOTWEAR & ACCESSORIES · USA

Wolverine World Wide, Inc. designs, manufactures, supplies, markets, licenses, and distributes footwear, apparel, and accessories in the United States, Europe, the Middle East, Africa, Asia Pacific, Canada, and Latin America. The company is headquartered in Rockford, Michigan.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?