Birkenstock Holding plc (BIRK)vsWolverine World Wide Inc (WWW)
BIRK
Birkenstock Holding plc
$36.37
-0.30%
CONSUMER CYCLICAL · Cap: $6.71B
WWW
Wolverine World Wide Inc
$16.86
-0.41%
CONSUMER CYCLICAL · Cap: $1.30B
Smart Verdict
WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison
Birkenstock Holding plc generates 14% more annual revenue ($2.14B vs $1.87B). BIRK leads profitability with a 17.7% profit margin vs 5.1%. BIRK appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.43. BIRK earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 71/100 (B).
BIRK
Strong Buy71
out of 100
Grade: B
WWW
Buy61
out of 100
Grade: C+
Intrinsic Value Comparison
Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula
Margin of Safety
+63.6%
Fair Value
$109.98
Current Price
$36.37
$73.61 discount
Margin of Safety
+66.6%
Fair Value
$53.35
Current Price
$16.86
$36.49 discount
Key Strengths & Concerns
Side-by-side fundamental analysis
Key Strengths
Attractively priced relative to earnings
Reasonable price relative to book value
Every $100 of equity generates 27 in profit
Attractively priced relative to earnings
Earnings expanding 36.0% YoY
Areas to Watch
1.5% earnings growth
Grey zone — moderate risk
Negative free cash flow — burning cash
Expensive relative to growth rate
4.6% revenue growth
Smaller company, higher risk/reward
5.1% margin — thin
Comparative Analysis Report
WallStSmart ResearchBull Case : BIRK
The strongest argument for BIRK centers on P/E Ratio, Price/Book. Profitability is solid with margins at 17.7% and operating margin at 19.0%. Revenue growth of 11.1% demonstrates continued momentum.
Bull Case : WWW
The strongest argument for WWW centers on Return on Equity, P/E Ratio, EPS Growth.
Bear Case : BIRK
The primary concerns for BIRK are EPS Growth, Altman Z-Score, Free Cash Flow.
Bear Case : WWW
The primary concerns for WWW are PEG Ratio, Revenue Growth, Market Cap.
Key Dynamics to Monitor
BIRK profiles as a mature stock while WWW is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.
WWW carries more volatility with a beta of 1.89 — expect wider price swings.
BIRK is growing revenue faster at 11.1% — sustainability is the question.
WWW generates stronger free cash flow (146M), providing more financial flexibility.
Bottom Line
BIRK scores higher overall (71/100 vs 61/100), backed by strong 17.7% margins and 11.1% revenue growth. WWW offers better value entry with a 66.6% margin of safety. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.
This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.
Birkenstock Holding plc
CONSUMER CYCLICAL · FOOTWEAR & ACCESSORIES · USA
Birkenstock Holding plc manufactures and sells footwear products. The company is headquartered in London, the United Kingdom.
Wolverine World Wide Inc
CONSUMER CYCLICAL · FOOTWEAR & ACCESSORIES · USA
Wolverine World Wide, Inc. designs, manufactures, supplies, markets, licenses, and distributes footwear, apparel, and accessories in the United States, Europe, the Middle East, Africa, Asia Pacific, Canada, and Latin America. The company is headquartered in Rockford, Michigan.
Compare with Other FOOTWEAR & ACCESSORIES Stocks
Want to dig deeper into these stocks?