WallStSmart

Q2 Holdings (QTWO)vsSony Group Corp (SONY)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Sony Group Corp generates 1656938% more annual revenue ($13.17T vs $794.81M). QTWO leads profitability with a 6.5% profit margin vs -1.6%. SONY appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 2.71. QTWO earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 50/100 (D+).

QTWO

Hold

50

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 8.0Profit: 5.0Value: 3.3Quality: 3.8
Piotroski: 5/9Altman Z: 0.56

SONY

Hold

47

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 5.3Profit: 5.0Value: 5.0Quality: 5.0
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

QTWOUndervalued (+4.0%)

Margin of Safety

+4.0%

Fair Value

$58.97

Current Price

$52.51

$6.46 discount

UndervaluedFair: $58.97Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for SONY.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

QTWO1 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
10802.0%10/10

Earnings expanding 10802.0% YoY

SONY4 strengths · Avg: 8.8/10
Free Cash FlowQuality
$898.45B10/10

Generating 898.5B in free cash flow

Market CapQuality
$118.69B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

P/E RatioValuation
15.6x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
2.3x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Areas to Watch

QTWO4 concerns · Avg: 2.3/10
Profit MarginProfitability
6.5%3/10

6.5% margin — thin

PEG RatioValuation
8.942/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

P/E RatioValuation
65.6x2/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
0.562/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

SONY3 concerns · Avg: 2.3/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
0.5%4/10

0.5% revenue growth

PEG RatioValuation
2.712/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Profit MarginProfitability
-1.6%1/10

Currently unprofitable

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : QTWO

The strongest argument for QTWO centers on EPS Growth. Revenue growth of 13.8% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : SONY

The strongest argument for SONY centers on Free Cash Flow, Market Cap, P/E Ratio.

Bear Case : QTWO

The primary concerns for QTWO are Profit Margin, PEG Ratio, P/E Ratio. A P/E of 65.6x leaves little room for execution misses.

Bear Case : SONY

The primary concerns for SONY are Revenue Growth, PEG Ratio, Profit Margin.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

QTWO profiles as a value stock while SONY is a turnaround play — different risk/reward profiles.

QTWO carries more volatility with a beta of 1.42 — expect wider price swings.

QTWO is growing revenue faster at 13.8% — sustainability is the question.

SONY generates stronger free cash flow (898.5B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

QTWO scores higher overall (50/100 vs 47/100) and 13.8% revenue growth. Both earn "Hold" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Q2 Holdings

TECHNOLOGY · SOFTWARE - APPLICATION · USA

Q2 Holdings, Inc. provides cloud-based digital banking solutions to Community and Regional Financial Institutions (RCFIs) in the United States. The company is headquartered in Austin, Texas.

Sony Group Corp

TECHNOLOGY · CONSUMER ELECTRONICS · USA

Sony Group Corporation designs, develops, produces and sells electronic equipment, instruments and devices for the consumer, professional and industrial markets worldwide. The company is headquartered in Tokyo, Japan.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?