WallStSmart

Q2 Holdings (QTWO)vsUber Technologies Inc (UBER)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Uber Technologies Inc generates 6426% more annual revenue ($55.23B vs $846.20M). UBER leads profitability with a 17.3% profit margin vs 10.9%. UBER appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 6.15. UBER earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 64/100 (C+).

QTWO

Buy

55

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 8.0Profit: 6.0Value: 3.7Quality: 5.0
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 0.76

UBER

Buy

64

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 8.0Profit: 7.5Value: 5.3Quality: 4.5
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 1.47
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

Intrinsic value data unavailable for QTWO.

UBERUndervalued (+0.4%)

Margin of Safety

+0.4%

Fair Value

$71.93

Current Price

$71.67

$0.26 discount

UndervaluedFair: $71.93Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

QTWO2 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
156.5%10/10

Earnings expanding 156.5% YoY

Debt/EquityHealth
0.0610/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

UBER5 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Return on EquityProfitability
35.1%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 35 in profit

EPS GrowthGrowth
85.5%10/10

Earnings expanding 85.5% YoY

Market CapQuality
$146.39B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

P/E RatioValuation
15.9x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Free Cash FlowQuality
$2.79B8/10

Generating 2.8B in free cash flow

Areas to Watch

QTWO3 concerns · Avg: 2.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
8.942/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

P/E RatioValuation
42.1x2/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
0.762/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

UBER2 concerns · Avg: 2.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
6.152/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.472/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : QTWO

The strongest argument for QTWO centers on EPS Growth, Debt/Equity. Revenue growth of 12.6% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : UBER

The strongest argument for UBER centers on Return on Equity, EPS Growth, Market Cap. Profitability is solid with margins at 17.3% and operating margin at 13.3%. Revenue growth of 12.2% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : QTWO

The primary concerns for QTWO are PEG Ratio, P/E Ratio, Altman Z-Score. A P/E of 42.1x leaves little room for execution misses.

Bear Case : UBER

The primary concerns for UBER are PEG Ratio, Altman Z-Score.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

QTWO profiles as a value stock while UBER is a mature play — different risk/reward profiles.

QTWO carries more volatility with a beta of 1.33 — expect wider price swings.

QTWO is growing revenue faster at 12.6% — sustainability is the question.

UBER generates stronger free cash flow (2.8B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

UBER scores higher overall (64/100 vs 55/100), backed by strong 17.3% margins and 12.2% revenue growth. Both earn "Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Q2 Holdings

TECHNOLOGY · SOFTWARE - APPLICATION · USA

Q2 Holdings, Inc. provides cloud-based digital banking solutions to Community and Regional Financial Institutions (RCFIs) in the United States. The company is headquartered in Austin, Texas.

Uber Technologies Inc

TECHNOLOGY · SOFTWARE - APPLICATION · USA

Uber Technologies, Inc., commonly known as Uber, is an American technology company. Its services include ride-hailing, food delivery (Uber Eats), package delivery, couriers, freight transportation, and, through a partnership with Lime, electric bicycle and motorized scooter rental. The company is based in San Francisco, California.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?