Restaurant Brands International Inc (QSR)vsYum China Holdings Inc (YUMC)
QSR
Restaurant Brands International Inc
$72.88
-0.56%
CONSUMER CYCLICAL · Cap: $35.86B
YUMC
Yum China Holdings Inc
$41.12
-0.56%
CONSUMER CYCLICAL · Cap: $14.74B
Smart Verdict
WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison
Yum China Holdings Inc generates 28% more annual revenue ($12.44B vs $9.70B). QSR leads profitability with a 13.1% profit margin vs 7.8%. YUMC appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.97. YUMC earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 71/100 (B).
QSR
Strong Buy68
out of 100
Grade: B-
YUMC
Strong Buy71
out of 100
Grade: B
Intrinsic Value Comparison
Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula
Margin of Safety
+25.0%
Fair Value
$94.22
Current Price
$72.88
$21.34 discount
Intrinsic value data unavailable for YUMC.
Key Strengths & Concerns
Side-by-side fundamental analysis
Key Strengths
Every $100 of equity generates 33 in profit
Earnings expanding 151.2% YoY
Strong operational efficiency at 27.7%
Growing faster than its price suggests
Attractively priced relative to earnings
Reasonable price relative to book value
Earnings expanding 21.4% YoY
Areas to Watch
4.6% revenue growth
Distress zone — elevated risk
Elevated debt levels
7.8% margin — thin
Comparative Analysis Report
WallStSmart ResearchBull Case : QSR
The strongest argument for QSR centers on Return on Equity, EPS Growth, Operating Margin. PEG of 1.24 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.
Bull Case : YUMC
The strongest argument for YUMC centers on PEG Ratio, P/E Ratio, Price/Book. Revenue growth of 12.6% demonstrates continued momentum. PEG of 0.97 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.
Bear Case : QSR
The primary concerns for QSR are Revenue Growth, Altman Z-Score, Debt/Equity. Debt-to-equity of 4.07 is elevated, increasing financial risk.
Bear Case : YUMC
The primary concerns for YUMC are Profit Margin.
Key Dynamics to Monitor
QSR carries more volatility with a beta of 0.53 — expect wider price swings.
YUMC is growing revenue faster at 12.6% — sustainability is the question.
QSR generates stronger free cash flow (479M), providing more financial flexibility.
Monitor RESTAURANTS industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.
Bottom Line
YUMC scores higher overall (71/100 vs 68/100) and 12.6% revenue growth. QSR offers better value entry with a 25.0% margin of safety. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Strong Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.
This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.
Restaurant Brands International Inc
CONSUMER CYCLICAL · RESTAURANTS · USA
Restaurant Brands International Inc. owns, operates and franchises quick-service restaurants under the Tim Hortons (TH), Burger King (BK) and Popeyes (PLK) brands. The company is headquartered in Toronto, Canada.
Yum China Holdings Inc
CONSUMER CYCLICAL · RESTAURANTS · USA
Yum China Holdings, Inc. owns, operates and franchises restaurants in China. The company is headquartered in Shanghai, China.
Visit Website →Compare with Other RESTAURANTS Stocks
Want to dig deeper into these stocks?