WallStSmart

QMMM Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares (QMMM)vsTrade Desk Inc (TTD)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Trade Desk Inc generates 154261% more annual revenue ($2.90B vs $1.88M). TTD leads profitability with a 15.3% profit margin vs -150.1%. TTD earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 72/100 (B).

QMMM

Avoid

14

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 2.7Profit: 2.0Value: 5.0Quality: 8.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 4.39

TTD

Strong Buy

72

out of 100

Grade: B

Growth: 7.3Profit: 8.0Value: 7.3Quality: 5.3
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 1.95
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

Intrinsic value data unavailable for QMMM.

TTDSignificantly Overvalued (-60.9%)

Margin of Safety

-60.9%

Fair Value

$16.92

Current Price

$24.11

$7.19 premium

UndervaluedFair: $16.92Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

QMMM2 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Debt/EquityHealth
0.0210/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
4.3910/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

TTD2 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Operating MarginProfitability
30.3%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 30.3%

PEG RatioValuation
0.908/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

Areas to Watch

QMMM4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
0.0%4/10

0.0% earnings growth

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Price/BookValuation
519.1x2/10

Trading at 519.1x book value

Return on EquityProfitability
-198.1%2/10

ROE of -198.1% — below average capital efficiency

TTD3 concerns · Avg: 3.7/10
P/E RatioValuation
26.8x4/10

Moderate valuation

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.954/10

Grey zone — moderate risk

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : QMMM

The strongest argument for QMMM centers on Debt/Equity, Altman Z-Score.

Bull Case : TTD

The strongest argument for TTD centers on Operating Margin, PEG Ratio. Profitability is solid with margins at 15.3% and operating margin at 30.3%. Revenue growth of 14.3% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : QMMM

The primary concerns for QMMM are EPS Growth, Piotroski F-Score, Price/Book.

Bear Case : TTD

The primary concerns for TTD are P/E Ratio, Altman Z-Score, Piotroski F-Score.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

QMMM profiles as a turnaround stock while TTD is a mature play — different risk/reward profiles.

TTD is growing revenue faster at 14.3% — sustainability is the question.

TTD generates stronger free cash flow (277M), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor ADVERTISING AGENCIES industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

TTD scores higher overall (72/100 vs 14/100), backed by strong 15.3% margins and 14.3% revenue growth. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

QMMM Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares

COMMUNICATION SERVICES · ADVERTISING AGENCIES · USA

QMMM Holdings Limited, provides digital media advertising and marketing production services primarily in Hong Kong.

Visit Website →

Trade Desk Inc

COMMUNICATION SERVICES · ADVERTISING AGENCIES · USA

Trade Desk, Inc. is a technology company in the United States and internationally. The company is headquartered in Ventura, California.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?