WallStSmart

DoubleVerify Holdings Inc (DV)vsQMMM Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares (QMMM)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

DoubleVerify Holdings Inc generates 39781% more annual revenue ($748.29M vs $1.88M). DV leads profitability with a 6.8% profit margin vs -150.1%. DV earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 64/100 (C+).

DV

Buy

64

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 8.0Profit: 5.5Value: 10.0Quality: 8.5
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 4.89

QMMM

Avoid

14

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 2.7Profit: 2.0Value: 5.0Quality: 8.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 4.39
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

DVUndervalued (+31.6%)

Margin of Safety

+31.6%

Fair Value

$14.04

Current Price

$10.05

$3.99 discount

UndervaluedFair: $14.04Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for QMMM.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

DV5 strengths · Avg: 9.2/10
Price/BookValuation
1.4x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Debt/EquityHealth
0.1010/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
4.8910/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

PEG RatioValuation
0.658/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

EPS GrowthGrowth
31.1%8/10

Earnings expanding 31.1% YoY

QMMM2 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Debt/EquityHealth
0.0210/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
4.3910/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

Areas to Watch

DV4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
P/E RatioValuation
33.5x4/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Market CapQuality
$1.63B3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Return on EquityProfitability
4.6%3/10

ROE of 4.6% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
6.8%3/10

6.8% margin — thin

QMMM4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
0.0%4/10

0.0% earnings growth

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Price/BookValuation
519.1x2/10

Trading at 519.1x book value

Return on EquityProfitability
-198.1%2/10

ROE of -198.1% — below average capital efficiency

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : DV

The strongest argument for DV centers on Price/Book, Debt/Equity, Altman Z-Score. PEG of 0.65 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : QMMM

The strongest argument for QMMM centers on Debt/Equity, Altman Z-Score.

Bear Case : DV

The primary concerns for DV are P/E Ratio, Market Cap, Return on Equity.

Bear Case : QMMM

The primary concerns for QMMM are EPS Growth, Piotroski F-Score, Price/Book.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

DV profiles as a value stock while QMMM is a turnaround play — different risk/reward profiles.

DV is growing revenue faster at 7.9% — sustainability is the question.

DV generates stronger free cash flow (62M), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor ADVERTISING AGENCIES industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

DV scores higher overall (64/100 vs 14/100). Both earn "Buy" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

DoubleVerify Holdings Inc

COMMUNICATION SERVICES · ADVERTISING AGENCIES · USA

DoubleVerify Holdings, Inc. provides a software platform for digital media measurement, data, and analysis. The company is headquartered in New York, New York with additional locations at Berlin, Germany; Chicago, Illinois; Merelbeke, Belgium; Helsinki, Finland; London, United Kingdom; Los Angeles and San Francisco, California; Miguel Hidalgo, Mexico; Paris, France; So Paulo, Brazil; Singapore, Singapore; Sydney, Australia; Tel Aviv, Israel; and Tokyo, Japan.

Visit Website →

QMMM Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares

COMMUNICATION SERVICES · ADVERTISING AGENCIES · USA

QMMM Holdings Limited, provides digital media advertising and marketing production services primarily in Hong Kong.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?