WallStSmart

QMMM Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares (QMMM)vsBanco Santander SA ADR (SAN)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Banco Santander SA ADR generates 2524763% more annual revenue ($47.37B vs $1.88M). SAN leads profitability with a 34.1% profit margin vs -150.1%. SAN earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 67/100 (B-).

QMMM

Avoid

14

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 2.7Profit: 2.0Value: 5.0Quality: 8.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 4.39

SAN

Strong Buy

67

out of 100

Grade: B-

Growth: 7.3Profit: 7.5Value: 5.7Quality: 3.8
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 0.38

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

QMMM2 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Debt/EquityHealth
0.0210/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
4.3910/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

SAN6 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
P/E RatioValuation
11.7x10/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Profit MarginProfitability
34.1%10/10

Keeps 34 of every $100 in revenue as profit

Operating MarginProfitability
43.3%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 43.3%

EPS GrowthGrowth
67.4%10/10

Earnings expanding 67.4% YoY

Market CapQuality
$175.40B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Price/BookValuation
1.5x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Areas to Watch

QMMM4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
0.0%4/10

0.0% earnings growth

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Price/BookValuation
519.1x2/10

Trading at 519.1x book value

Return on EquityProfitability
-198.1%2/10

ROE of -198.1% — below average capital efficiency

SAN4 concerns · Avg: 2.3/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
4.6%4/10

4.6% revenue growth

PEG RatioValuation
2.792/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
0.382/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Debt/EquityHealth
4.471/10

Elevated debt levels

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : QMMM

The strongest argument for QMMM centers on Debt/Equity, Altman Z-Score.

Bull Case : SAN

The strongest argument for SAN centers on P/E Ratio, Profit Margin, Operating Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 34.1% and operating margin at 43.3%.

Bear Case : QMMM

The primary concerns for QMMM are EPS Growth, Piotroski F-Score, Price/Book.

Bear Case : SAN

The primary concerns for SAN are Revenue Growth, PEG Ratio, Altman Z-Score. Debt-to-equity of 4.47 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

QMMM profiles as a turnaround stock while SAN is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

SAN is growing revenue faster at 4.6% — sustainability is the question.

Monitor ADVERTISING AGENCIES industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

SAN scores higher overall (67/100 vs 14/100), backed by strong 34.1% margins. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

QMMM Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares

COMMUNICATION SERVICES · ADVERTISING AGENCIES · USA

QMMM Holdings Limited, provides digital media advertising and marketing production services primarily in Hong Kong.

Visit Website →

Banco Santander SA ADR

FINANCIAL SERVICES · BANKS - DIVERSIFIED · USA

Banco Santander, SA, offers various commercial and retail banking products and services to individuals, small and medium-sized companies and large companies worldwide. The company is headquartered in Madrid, Spain.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?