WallStSmart

ProPetro Holding Corp (PUMP)vsExxon Mobil Corp (XOM)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Exxon Mobil Corp generates 30487% more annual revenue ($361.06B vs $1.18B). XOM leads profitability with a 9.1% profit margin vs -1.1%. XOM earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 72/100 (B).

PUMP

Avoid

31

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 2.0Profit: 2.0Value: 5.0Quality: 7.0
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 2.10

XOM

Strong Buy

72

out of 100

Grade: B

Growth: 7.3Profit: 6.5Value: 4.7Quality: 6.5
Piotroski: 1/9Altman Z: 3.44
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

Intrinsic value data unavailable for PUMP.

XOMSignificantly Overvalued (-65.4%)

Margin of Safety

-65.4%

Fair Value

$91.66

Current Price

$152.94

$61.28 premium

UndervaluedFair: $91.66Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

PUMP2 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
Price/BookValuation
1.4x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Debt/EquityHealth
0.199/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

XOM6 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
Market CapQuality
$638.16B10/10

Mega-cap, among the largest globally

Revenue GrowthGrowth
44.1%10/10

Revenue surging 44.1% year-over-year

EPS GrowthGrowth
112.8%10/10

Earnings expanding 112.8% YoY

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
3.4410/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

Debt/EquityHealth
0.199/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Price/BookValuation
2.4x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Areas to Watch

PUMP4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Market CapQuality
$1.25B3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Return on EquityProfitability
-1.3%2/10

ROE of -1.3% — below average capital efficiency

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-24.7%2/10

Revenue declined 24.7%

XOM2 concerns · Avg: 3.5/10
P/E RatioValuation
26.1x4/10

Moderate valuation

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
1/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : PUMP

The strongest argument for PUMP centers on Price/Book, Debt/Equity.

Bull Case : XOM

The strongest argument for XOM centers on Market Cap, Revenue Growth, EPS Growth. Revenue growth of 44.1% demonstrates continued momentum. PEG of 1.32 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : PUMP

The primary concerns for PUMP are Market Cap, Piotroski F-Score, Return on Equity.

Bear Case : XOM

The primary concerns for XOM are P/E Ratio, Piotroski F-Score.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

PUMP profiles as a turnaround stock while XOM is a hypergrowth play — different risk/reward profiles.

PUMP carries more volatility with a beta of 0.73 — expect wider price swings.

XOM is growing revenue faster at 44.1% — sustainability is the question.

XOM generates stronger free cash flow (2.2B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

XOM scores higher overall (72/100 vs 31/100) and 44.1% revenue growth. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

ProPetro Holding Corp

ENERGY · OIL & GAS EQUIPMENT & SERVICES · USA

ProPetro Holding Corp. The company is headquartered in Midland, Texas.

Visit Website →

Exxon Mobil Corp

ENERGY · OIL & GAS INTEGRATED · USA

Exxon Mobil Corporation, stylized as ExxonMobil, is an American multinational oil and gas corporation headquartered in Irving, Texas. It is the largest direct descendant of John D. Rockefeller's Standard Oil, and was formed on November 30, 1999 by the merger of Exxon (formerly the Standard Oil Company of New Jersey) and Mobil (formerly the Standard Oil Company of New York). ExxonMobil's primary brands are Exxon, Mobil, Esso, and ExxonMobil Chemical. ExxonMobil is incorporated in New Jersey.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?