WallStSmart

TechnipFMC PLC (FTI)vsExxon Mobil Corp (XOM)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Exxon Mobil Corp generates 3161% more annual revenue ($323.90B vs $9.93B). FTI leads profitability with a 9.7% profit margin vs 8.9%. XOM appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.38. FTI earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 56/100 (C).

FTI

Buy

56

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 7.3Profit: 7.5Value: 3.3Quality: 5.0

XOM

Buy

50

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 2.0Profit: 6.0Value: 4.7Quality: 6.5
Piotroski: 1/9Altman Z: 3.44
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

FTISignificantly Overvalued (-36.2%)

Margin of Safety

-36.2%

Fair Value

$45.38

Current Price

$76.99

$31.61 premium

UndervaluedFair: $45.38Overvalued
XOMSignificantly Overvalued (-46.3%)

Margin of Safety

-46.3%

Fair Value

$105.46

Current Price

$154.67

$49.21 premium

UndervaluedFair: $105.46Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

FTI1 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Return on EquityProfitability
29.6%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 30 in profit

XOM5 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Market CapQuality
$642.90B10/10

Mega-cap, among the largest globally

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
3.4410/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

Debt/EquityHealth
0.279/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Price/BookValuation
2.5x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Free Cash FlowQuality
$5.23B8/10

Generating 5.2B in free cash flow

Areas to Watch

FTI3 concerns · Avg: 4.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
2.184/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

P/E RatioValuation
33.5x4/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Price/BookValuation
9.2x4/10

Trading at 9.2x book value

XOM3 concerns · Avg: 2.3/10
Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
1/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-1.3%2/10

Revenue declined 1.3%

EPS GrowthGrowth
-11.0%2/10

Earnings declined 11.0%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : FTI

The strongest argument for FTI centers on Return on Equity.

Bull Case : XOM

The strongest argument for XOM centers on Market Cap, Altman Z-Score, Debt/Equity. PEG of 1.38 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : FTI

The primary concerns for FTI are PEG Ratio, P/E Ratio, Price/Book.

Bear Case : XOM

The primary concerns for XOM are Piotroski F-Score, Revenue Growth, EPS Growth.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

FTI carries more volatility with a beta of 0.71 — expect wider price swings.

FTI is growing revenue faster at 6.3% — sustainability is the question.

XOM generates stronger free cash flow (5.2B), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor OIL & GAS EQUIPMENT & SERVICES industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

FTI scores higher overall (56/100 vs 50/100). Both earn "Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

TechnipFMC PLC

ENERGY · OIL & GAS EQUIPMENT & SERVICES · USA

TechnipFMC plc is involved in oil and gas projects, technologies, systems and services. The company is headquartered in London, the United Kingdom.

Exxon Mobil Corp

ENERGY · OIL & GAS INTEGRATED · USA

Exxon Mobil Corporation, stylized as ExxonMobil, is an American multinational oil and gas corporation headquartered in Irving, Texas. It is the largest direct descendant of John D. Rockefeller's Standard Oil, and was formed on November 30, 1999 by the merger of Exxon (formerly the Standard Oil Company of New Jersey) and Mobil (formerly the Standard Oil Company of New York). ExxonMobil's primary brands are Exxon, Mobil, Esso, and ExxonMobil Chemical. ExxonMobil is incorporated in New Jersey.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?