WallStSmart

Parker-Hannifin Corporation (PH)vsXPO Logistics Inc (XPO)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Parker-Hannifin Corporation generates 153% more annual revenue ($20.99B vs $8.30B). PH leads profitability with a 16.6% profit margin vs 4.2%. XPO appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 2.53. PH earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 55/100 (C-).

PH

Buy

55

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 4.7Profit: 8.0Value: 3.7Quality: 6.0
Piotroski: 5/9Altman Z: 2.78

XPO

Buy

53

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 6.7Profit: 6.0Value: 2.0Quality: 4.0
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 1.63
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

Intrinsic value data unavailable for PH.

XPOSignificantly Overvalued (-23.4%)

Margin of Safety

-23.4%

Fair Value

$163.60

Current Price

$218.94

$55.34 premium

UndervaluedFair: $163.60Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

PH3 strengths · Avg: 8.7/10
Market CapQuality
$105.45B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Return on EquityProfitability
23.8%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 24 in profit

Operating MarginProfitability
21.5%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 21.5%

XPO1 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
46.6%8/10

Earnings expanding 46.6% YoY

Areas to Watch

PH3 concerns · Avg: 2.7/10
P/E RatioValuation
30.9x4/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

PEG RatioValuation
3.232/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

EPS GrowthGrowth
-4.2%2/10

Earnings declined 4.2%

XPO4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
Price/BookValuation
13.8x4/10

Trading at 13.8x book value

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.634/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Profit MarginProfitability
4.2%3/10

4.2% margin — thin

PEG RatioValuation
2.532/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : PH

The strongest argument for PH centers on Market Cap, Return on Equity, Operating Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 16.6% and operating margin at 21.5%. Revenue growth of 10.6% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : XPO

The strongest argument for XPO centers on EPS Growth.

Bear Case : PH

The primary concerns for PH are P/E Ratio, PEG Ratio, EPS Growth.

Bear Case : XPO

The primary concerns for XPO are Price/Book, Altman Z-Score, Profit Margin. A P/E of 78.7x leaves little room for execution misses. Debt-to-equity of 2.18 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

PH profiles as a mature stock while XPO is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

XPO carries more volatility with a beta of 1.64 — expect wider price swings.

PH is growing revenue faster at 10.6% — sustainability is the question.

PH generates stronger free cash flow (881M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

PH scores higher overall (55/100 vs 53/100), backed by strong 16.6% margins and 10.6% revenue growth. Both earn "Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Parker-Hannifin Corporation

INDUSTRIALS · SPECIALTY INDUSTRIAL MACHINERY · USA

Parker-Hannifin Corporation, originally Parker Appliance Company, usually referred to as just Parker, is an American corporation specializing in motion and control technologies. Its corporate headquarters are in Mayfield Heights, Ohio, in Greater Cleveland.

XPO Logistics Inc

INDUSTRIALS · TRUCKING · USA

XPO Logistics, Inc. provides supply chain solutions in the United States, the rest of North America, France, the United Kingdom, the rest of Europe, and internationally. The company is headquartered in Greenwich, Connecticut.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?