WallStSmart

PEDEVCO Corp (PED)vsExxon Mobil Corp (XOM)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Exxon Mobil Corp generates 712470% more annual revenue ($326.01B vs $45.75M). XOM leads profitability with a 7.8% profit margin vs -22.7%. XOM earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 50/100 (C-).

PED

Avoid

34

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 6.7Profit: 2.5Value: 5.0Quality: 5.0

XOM

Buy

50

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 2.7Profit: 5.5Value: 4.7Quality: 6.5
Piotroski: 1/9Altman Z: 3.44
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

Intrinsic value data unavailable for PED.

XOMSignificantly Overvalued (-45.2%)

Margin of Safety

-45.2%

Fair Value

$106.68

Current Price

$148.69

$42.01 premium

UndervaluedFair: $106.68Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

PED2 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Price/BookValuation
0.4x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Revenue GrowthGrowth
118.2%10/10

Revenue surging 118.2% year-over-year

XOM5 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Market CapQuality
$634.91B10/10

Mega-cap, among the largest globally

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
3.4410/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

Debt/EquityHealth
0.279/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Price/BookValuation
2.4x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Free Cash FlowQuality
$2.23B8/10

Generating 2.2B in free cash flow

Areas to Watch

PED4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Market CapQuality
$196.32M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Operating MarginProfitability
4.1%3/10

Operating margin of 4.1%

Return on EquityProfitability
-6.4%2/10

ROE of -6.4% — below average capital efficiency

EPS GrowthGrowth
-82.3%2/10

Earnings declined 82.3%

XOM4 concerns · Avg: 3.5/10
P/E RatioValuation
25.7x4/10

Moderate valuation

Revenue GrowthGrowth
2.6%4/10

2.6% revenue growth

Profit MarginProfitability
7.8%3/10

7.8% margin — thin

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
1/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : PED

The strongest argument for PED centers on Price/Book, Revenue Growth. Revenue growth of 118.2% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : XOM

The strongest argument for XOM centers on Market Cap, Altman Z-Score, Debt/Equity. PEG of 1.40 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : PED

The primary concerns for PED are Market Cap, Operating Margin, Return on Equity.

Bear Case : XOM

The primary concerns for XOM are P/E Ratio, Revenue Growth, Profit Margin.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

PED profiles as a hypergrowth stock while XOM is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

XOM carries more volatility with a beta of 0.29 — expect wider price swings.

PED is growing revenue faster at 118.2% — sustainability is the question.

XOM generates stronger free cash flow (2.2B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

XOM scores higher overall (50/100 vs 34/100). Both earn "Buy" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

PEDEVCO Corp

ENERGY · OIL & GAS E&P · USA

PEDEVCO Corp.

Visit Website →

Exxon Mobil Corp

ENERGY · OIL & GAS INTEGRATED · USA

Exxon Mobil Corporation, stylized as ExxonMobil, is an American multinational oil and gas corporation headquartered in Irving, Texas. It is the largest direct descendant of John D. Rockefeller's Standard Oil, and was formed on November 30, 1999 by the merger of Exxon (formerly the Standard Oil Company of New Jersey) and Mobil (formerly the Standard Oil Company of New York). ExxonMobil's primary brands are Exxon, Mobil, Esso, and ExxonMobil Chemical. ExxonMobil is incorporated in New Jersey.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?