Diamondback Energy Inc (FANG)vsPEDEVCO Corp (PED)
FANG
Diamondback Energy Inc
$196.02
-0.53%
ENERGY · Cap: $55.59B
PED
PEDEVCO Corp
$14.59
-9.77%
ENERGY · Cap: $49.12M
Smart Verdict
WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison
Diamondback Energy Inc generates 42899% more annual revenue ($14.29B vs $33.24M). PED leads profitability with a 28.7% profit margin vs 11.6%. PED trades at a lower P/E of 4.7x. FANG earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 45/100 (D+).
FANG
Hold45
out of 100
Grade: D+
PED
Avoid29
out of 100
Grade: F
Intrinsic Value Comparison
Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula
Margin of Safety
-29.4%
Fair Value
$130.64
Current Price
$196.02
$65.38 premium
Margin of Safety
+18.1%
Fair Value
$0.75
Current Price
$14.59
$13.84 discount
Key Strengths & Concerns
Side-by-side fundamental analysis
Key Strengths
Large-cap with strong market position
Reasonable price relative to book value
Generating 1.4B in free cash flow
Attractively priced relative to earnings
Keeps 29 of every $100 in revenue as profit
Areas to Watch
Premium valuation, high expectations priced in
ROE of 3.7% — below average capital efficiency
Weak financial health signals
Expensive relative to growth rate
Trading at 11.7x book value
Smaller company, higher risk/reward
Revenue declined 23.1%
Earnings declined 82.3%
Comparative Analysis Report
WallStSmart ResearchBull Case : FANG
The strongest argument for FANG centers on Market Cap, Price/Book, Free Cash Flow.
Bull Case : PED
The strongest argument for PED centers on P/E Ratio, Profit Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 28.7% and operating margin at -12.0%.
Bear Case : FANG
The primary concerns for FANG are P/E Ratio, Return on Equity, Piotroski F-Score.
Bear Case : PED
The primary concerns for PED are Price/Book, Market Cap, Revenue Growth.
Key Dynamics to Monitor
FANG carries more volatility with a beta of 0.57 — expect wider price swings.
FANG is growing revenue faster at -9.4% — sustainability is the question.
FANG generates stronger free cash flow (1.4B), providing more financial flexibility.
Monitor OIL & GAS E&P industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.
Bottom Line
FANG scores higher overall (45/100 vs 29/100). PED offers better value entry with a 18.1% margin of safety. Both earn "Hold" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.
This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.
Diamondback Energy Inc
ENERGY · OIL & GAS E&P · USA
Diamondback Energy is a company engaged in hydrocarbon exploration and headquartered in Midland, Texas.
Compare with Other OIL & GAS E&P Stocks
Want to dig deeper into these stocks?