WallStSmart

Diamondback Energy Inc (FANG)vsPEDEVCO Corp (PED)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Diamondback Energy Inc generates 13861% more annual revenue ($16.25B vs $116.38M). FANG leads profitability with a 9.0% profit margin vs -14.6%. FANG earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 69/100 (B-).

FANG

Strong Buy

69

out of 100

Grade: B-

Growth: 9.3Profit: 6.0Value: 5.3Quality: 4.5
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 1.28

PED

Hold

48

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 6.7Profit: 5.0Value: 5.0Quality: 4.0
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 0.32
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

FANGUndervalued (+46.8%)

Margin of Safety

+46.8%

Fair Value

$317.93

Current Price

$192.42

$125.51 discount

UndervaluedFair: $317.93Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for PED.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

FANG6 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
Price/BookValuation
1.4x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Operating MarginProfitability
48.5%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 48.5%

Revenue GrowthGrowth
52.5%10/10

Revenue surging 52.5% year-over-year

EPS GrowthGrowth
179.5%10/10

Earnings expanding 179.5% YoY

Market CapQuality
$57.40B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Free Cash FlowQuality
$2.59B8/10

Generating 2.6B in free cash flow

PED3 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Price/BookValuation
0.9x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Operating MarginProfitability
33.2%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 33.2%

Revenue GrowthGrowth
561.0%10/10

Revenue surging 561.0% year-over-year

Areas to Watch

FANG4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
39.0x4/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Return on EquityProfitability
4.2%3/10

ROE of 4.2% — below average capital efficiency

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
25.242/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

PED4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Market CapQuality
$193.13M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Return on EquityProfitability
-23.8%2/10

ROE of -23.8% — below average capital efficiency

EPS GrowthGrowth
-82.3%2/10

Earnings declined 82.3%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : FANG

The strongest argument for FANG centers on Price/Book, Operating Margin, Revenue Growth. Revenue growth of 52.5% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : PED

The strongest argument for PED centers on Price/Book, Operating Margin, Revenue Growth. Revenue growth of 561.0% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : FANG

The primary concerns for FANG are P/E Ratio, Return on Equity, Piotroski F-Score.

Bear Case : PED

The primary concerns for PED are Market Cap, Piotroski F-Score, Return on Equity.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

FANG carries more volatility with a beta of 0.41 — expect wider price swings.

PED is growing revenue faster at 561.0% — sustainability is the question.

FANG generates stronger free cash flow (2.6B), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor OIL & GAS E&P industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

FANG scores higher overall (69/100 vs 48/100) and 52.5% revenue growth. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Diamondback Energy Inc

ENERGY · OIL & GAS E&P · USA

Diamondback Energy is a company engaged in hydrocarbon exploration and headquartered in Midland, Texas.

PEDEVCO Corp

ENERGY · OIL & GAS E&P · USA

PEDEVCO Corp.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?