WallStSmart

Palo Alto Networks Inc (PANW)vsPaysign Inc (PAYS)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Palo Alto Networks Inc generates 10716% more annual revenue ($9.89B vs $91.47M). PANW leads profitability with a 13.0% profit margin vs 11.4%. PAYS trades at a lower P/E of 38.3x. PAYS earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 59/100 (C).

PANW

Buy

57

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 8.0Profit: 6.0Value: 4.7Quality: 4.5
Piotroski: 1/9Altman Z: 1.02

PAYS

Buy

59

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 10.0Profit: 6.5Value: 6.3Quality: 5.0
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 0.69
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

PANWUndervalued (+39.7%)

Margin of Safety

+39.7%

Fair Value

$441.96

Current Price

$272.05

$169.91 discount

UndervaluedFair: $441.96Overvalued
PAYSUndervalued (+53.0%)

Margin of Safety

+53.0%

Fair Value

$7.21

Current Price

$6.79

$0.42 discount

UndervaluedFair: $7.21Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

PANW3 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Market CapQuality
$241.01B10/10

Mega-cap, among the largest globally

EPS GrowthGrowth
60.5%10/10

Earnings expanding 60.5% YoY

Debt/EquityHealth
0.0710/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

PAYS4 strengths · Avg: 9.3/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
50.8%10/10

Revenue surging 50.8% year-over-year

EPS GrowthGrowth
86.5%10/10

Earnings expanding 86.5% YoY

Debt/EquityHealth
0.119/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Operating MarginProfitability
23.8%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 23.8%

Areas to Watch

PANW4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Return on EquityProfitability
3.0%3/10

ROE of 3.0% — below average capital efficiency

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
1/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
5.042/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

P/E RatioValuation
256.2x2/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

PAYS4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
38.3x4/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Market CapQuality
$385.19M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
0.692/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : PANW

The strongest argument for PANW centers on Market Cap, EPS Growth, Debt/Equity. Revenue growth of 14.9% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : PAYS

The strongest argument for PAYS centers on Revenue Growth, EPS Growth, Debt/Equity. Revenue growth of 50.8% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : PANW

The primary concerns for PANW are Return on Equity, Piotroski F-Score, PEG Ratio. A P/E of 256.2x leaves little room for execution misses.

Bear Case : PAYS

The primary concerns for PAYS are P/E Ratio, Market Cap, Piotroski F-Score.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

PANW profiles as a value stock while PAYS is a growth play — different risk/reward profiles.

PANW carries more volatility with a beta of 0.77 — expect wider price swings.

PAYS is growing revenue faster at 50.8% — sustainability is the question.

PANW generates stronger free cash flow (788M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

PAYS scores higher overall (59/100 vs 57/100) and 50.8% revenue growth. PANW offers better value entry with a 39.7% margin of safety. Both earn "Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Palo Alto Networks Inc

TECHNOLOGY · SOFTWARE - INFRASTRUCTURE · USA

Palo Alto Networks, Inc. provides cybersecurity platform solutions globally. The company is headquartered in Santa Clara, California.

Paysign Inc

TECHNOLOGY · SOFTWARE - INFRASTRUCTURE · USA

PaySign, Inc. offers prepaid card products and processing services under the PaySign brand for corporate, consumer and government applications. The company is headquartered in Henderson, Nevada.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?