WallStSmart

Omnicom Group Inc (OMC)vsRestaurant Brands International Inc (QSR)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Omnicom Group Inc generates 83% more annual revenue ($17.27B vs $9.43B). QSR leads profitability with a 8.2% profit margin vs -0.3%. QSR appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.16. QSR earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 57/100 (C).

OMC

Hold

49

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 5.3Profit: 4.5Value: 4.0Quality: 3.5
Piotroski: 1/9Altman Z: 0.76

QSR

Buy

57

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 5.3Profit: 7.5Value: 7.3Quality: 4.3
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 0.93
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

Intrinsic value data unavailable for OMC.

QSRSignificantly Overvalued (-295.4%)

Margin of Safety

-295.4%

Fair Value

$17.88

Current Price

$72.92

$55.04 premium

UndervaluedFair: $17.88Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

OMC3 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
Price/BookValuation
2.0x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Revenue GrowthGrowth
27.9%8/10

Revenue surging 27.9% year-over-year

Free Cash FlowQuality
$3.00B8/10

Generating 3.0B in free cash flow

QSR2 strengths · Avg: 8.5/10
Return on EquityProfitability
24.0%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 24 in profit

Operating MarginProfitability
26.4%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 26.4%

Areas to Watch

OMC4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Return on EquityProfitability
0.5%3/10

ROE of 0.5% — below average capital efficiency

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
1/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
15.972/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

EPS GrowthGrowth
-10.3%2/10

Earnings declined 10.3%

QSR3 concerns · Avg: 2.7/10
P/E RatioValuation
28.1x4/10

Moderate valuation

EPS GrowthGrowth
-57.4%2/10

Earnings declined 57.4%

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
0.932/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : OMC

The strongest argument for OMC centers on Price/Book, Revenue Growth, Free Cash Flow. Revenue growth of 27.9% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : QSR

The strongest argument for QSR centers on Return on Equity, Operating Margin. PEG of 1.16 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : OMC

The primary concerns for OMC are Return on Equity, Piotroski F-Score, PEG Ratio.

Bear Case : QSR

The primary concerns for QSR are P/E Ratio, EPS Growth, Altman Z-Score.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

OMC profiles as a growth stock while QSR is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

OMC carries more volatility with a beta of 0.71 — expect wider price swings.

OMC is growing revenue faster at 27.9% — sustainability is the question.

OMC generates stronger free cash flow (3.0B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

QSR scores higher overall (57/100 vs 49/100). Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Omnicom Group Inc

COMMUNICATION SERVICES · ADVERTISING AGENCIES · USA

Omnicom Group Inc. is an American global media, marketing and corporate communications holding company, headquartered in New York City.

Visit Website →

Restaurant Brands International Inc

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · RESTAURANTS · USA

Restaurant Brands International Inc. owns, operates and franchises quick-service restaurants under the Tim Hortons (TH), Burger King (BK) and Popeyes (PLK) brands. The company is headquartered in Toronto, Canada.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?